Who to play D6?

Started by enzedder, March 20, 2014, 07:26:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

enzedder


Bully

I just plumped for Langford given his outstanding preseason form.

Ricochet

Def play Langford mate. Named int he guts, posted good numbers in NAB and has solid JS

Bully

Quote from: Ricochet on March 21, 2014, 04:21:01 PM
Def play Langford mate. Named int he guts, posted good numbers in NAB and has solid JS

Here's a more testing question, does one take the 111 with a non-playing rookie or roll the dice with Langford?

Ricochet

Quote from: Bully on March 21, 2014, 04:23:06 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 21, 2014, 04:21:01 PM
Def play Langford mate. Named int he guts, posted good numbers in NAB and has solid JS

Here's a more testing question, does one take the 111 with a non-playing rookie or roll the dice with Langford?
Personally I can see Langford going around the 90 mark so I would run with that. Not a fan of picking non playing rookies for the sake of one score

Bully

Quote from: Ricochet on March 21, 2014, 04:32:28 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 21, 2014, 04:23:06 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 21, 2014, 04:21:01 PM
Def play Langford mate. Named int he guts, posted good numbers in NAB and has solid JS

Here's a more testing question, does one take the 111 with a non-playing rookie or roll the dice with Langford?
Personally I can see Langford going around the 90 mark so I would run with that. Not a fan of picking non playing rookies for the sake of one score

It's also a move designed to assess my options over the first 2 weeks and exploit the loophole next week. I've got 2 positions left with Langford, McDonald, Laidler & Georgiou all vying for a cap. But if you say 90, I'm tempted. do I get a money back guarantee?

Ricochet

Quote from: Bully on March 21, 2014, 04:41:02 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 21, 2014, 04:32:28 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 21, 2014, 04:23:06 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 21, 2014, 04:21:01 PM
Def play Langford mate. Named int he guts, posted good numbers in NAB and has solid JS

Here's a more testing question, does one take the 111 with a non-playing rookie or roll the dice with Langford?
Personally I can see Langford going around the 90 mark so I would run with that. Not a fan of picking non playing rookies for the sake of one score

It's also a move designed to assess my options over the first 2 weeks and exploit the loophole next week. I've got 2 positions left with Langford, McDonald, Laidler & Georgiou all vying for a cap. But if you say 90, I'm tempted. do I get a money back guarantee?
Hahaha unfortunately not. I guess you'll be looking to burn a trade after round 2 anyway then? If so then grab Langdon's score