Mcdonald dilemma

Started by sammy123, March 20, 2014, 11:27:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

sammy123

Anyone else have this dilemma.

Have mcdonald at D6. My D7,8 have already played. So if mcdonald is sub will have to take his score?

Anyone face this problem?

BigMac_93

I assume others would face this problem. I decided to put him at M10 and have Langford at D6. Im pretty confident Langford won't be the sub.

Sweetness

If he is the sub do we just ditch him for Georgiou?
Assuming Georgiou won't be the sub...

footy25

Yeah I'm in the same boat, if Mcdonald is sub than I'll just field Georgiou. If Georgiou is also sub I'll be filthy but will have to take it

HotTiges

Have d5 so could ditch for Langford if sub..thing is if sub do we ditch straight away and forget him?

petefisker

Quote from: sammy123 on March 20, 2014, 11:27:38 PM
Anyone else have this dilemma.

Have mcdonald at D6. My D7,8 have already played. So if mcdonald is sub will have to take his score?

Anyone face this problem?

All the people that replied have the advantage of benching him.
Sammy, i'm in your boat where i've got clurey and langdon on the bench both played.
Also with no E on either of them to take advantage of a loophole.  :'(
Based on the Hawks picks - Tim O'Brien and Derick Wanganeen have been named on the bench, and Langford has been named on the ball. Pretty confident Tim or Derick will be sub.
In saying that, if Mcdonald is named sub - im going to trade him to Langford.
In 2 rounds time, if Mcdonald is still a must have i'll trade Clurey to him as a fix up trade.

Sweetness

Quote from: petefisker on March 21, 2014, 10:43:22 AM
Quote from: sammy123 on March 20, 2014, 11:27:38 PM
Anyone else have this dilemma.

Have mcdonald at D6. My D7,8 have already played. So if mcdonald is sub will have to take his score?

Anyone face this problem?

All the people that replied have the advantage of benching him.
Sammy, i'm in your boat where i've got clurey and langdon on the bench both played.
Also with no E on either of them to take advantage of a loophole.  :'(
Based on the Hawks picks - Tim O'Brien and Derick Wanganeen have been named on the bench, and Langford has been named on the ball. Pretty confident Tim or Derick will be sub.
In saying that, if Mcdonald is named sub - im going to trade him to Langford.
In 2 rounds time, if Mcdonald is still a must have i'll trade Clurey to him as a fix up trade.

Exactly my position.
And exactly my thoughts

Free Kick

#7
Quote from: sammy123 on March 20, 2014, 11:27:38 PM
Anyone else have this dilemma.

Have mcdonald at D6. My D7,8 have already played. So if mcdonald is sub will have to take his score?

Anyone face this problem?

Yeah same boat Sammy..

I have Langdon and Laidler on bench, luckily both scored well..

For all the talk and shuffling going on around the Rookies,I've decided to LEAVE McDonald in the Backs and LEAVE Crouch in the Mids..

Gut feel tells me they will cement their spots and make $$$, and I'm not willing to burn early trades if it's not absolutely necessary.

It's a long season and TRADES ARE GOLD, especially come finals time.. 8)

Mr.Craig

Quote from: petefisker on March 21, 2014, 10:43:22 AM
Based on the Hawks picks - Tim O'Brien and Derick Wanganeen have been named on the bench, and Langford has been named on the ball. Pretty confident Tim or Derick will be sub.

I have a feeling the sub will be Simpkin. Would be surprised if it was Wanganeen. Would fall off my chair if it was Langford.