Grimes vs Swallow

[gogonz]

I originally had Grimes after watching them vs tiggers.  But honestly, I think it could go either way.  I'm keeping Swallow for now and hoping I don't have to trade him for Grimes after rd 2 but I won't be surprised if I do.  Hard to see them both going bang but my gut says one of them will.

[tor01doc]

If it that lineball, then consider byes.

If still no help then pick the guy in the better team ie Swallow.

Majority of players who score higher are from better teams.

[Speculator]

It's swallow easily for mine. Grimes is a broken down defender. Swallow is a number one Draft pick midfielder.

[DaveElNacho]

Can't decide but my hunch is telling me to go with Grimes ...

SC rule No.3: Always go with your gut.

Marstar, pray tell what are SC rules No.1 and 2?

My guess is get Ablett as No.1 and Pendles as No. 2.

1st RULE: You do not talk about SUPERCOACH.
2nd RULE: You DO NOT talk about SUPERCOACH.

And I'd go swallow solely on Grimes' injury concerns. Even that's iffy though.. Too much talent in the GC midfield to fit Swallow I think. He'll be good but not consistently. Just go Webster and spend the cash elsewhere?

[Doggoneit]

I originally had Grimes after watching them vs tiggers. 

I think there another SC rule - something about form out of NAB matches !!!!!!!

[bradw]

I hate to disagree with most, but Grimes for me... easier draw, new coach. I also think he can average 90+ for the season with injuries behind him. I had Grimes and Swallow from the start, but not sure if I can fit both in.
I think Melbourne will be far more competitive than some think this season and Grimes could be a key player....but it's all a guessing game at this stage    ::)