Luke McDonald - Really?

[Bones Bombers]

If we use last years players as an example, I see LMac being like Terlich and Vlastuin and Georgiou being like Stevenson and Heath.
I know which I'd prefer.
I did like the look of Georiou in the Nab games but with other options coming up not sure I need him now.

[elephants]

Why the sudden doubt over McDonald?? Will score much better than Georgiou, better JS than Langford, will actually be playing which at this stage KK is not (yes, if he comes back R2 then great, but I didnt take BCrouch last year and wont risk it this year either)
North see him as a second or third year player and he's been training like all the other senior players (vs first year players who are still building their size or tank)
Plays an attacking brand of footy with great skills...

Actually nvm guys, feel free to leave him out ;)

what evidence do u have that suggests he will score better than georgiou? and remember there is 80k difference in price (averages less than georgiou in both nab games) - stupid comment

well apart from their roles in the ream, there's this:

Georgiou: 60 points per 100 mins

McDonald: 71 points per 100 mins

(If you want to go by just a few NAB games)

dont get me wrong i have locked in mcdonald but i just wanted to know some evidence

... Dude, he's given you the nab stats. Thats all we can do since they haven't even played an AFL game yet. We can pretty safely make an educated guess that L-Mac will average more by using these stats & taking into account the roles each player is expected to play. ::)

ahh dude when i made my comment he hadnt given any stats ... i just think we are all expecting mcdonald to score well but the reality of it is ... he is only going to score in the 65 point range ... georgiou can do this and 80k cheaper

He gave you nab stats, directly after that you asked for evidence. He gave you all the evidence there is at this time..

[Bones Bombers]

The second post says "wanted" not "want". Lay off. Move on.

[elephants]

The second post says "wanted" not "want". Lay off. Move on.

Thats a bit of a moot point. May as well wait until round 5 to make your team if you want/wanted evidence...

And no, I'll lay where I want.

[Bones Bombers]

The second post says "wanted" not "want". Lay off. Move on.

Thats a bit of a moot point. May as well wait until round 5 to make your team if you want/wanted evidence...

And no, I'll lay where I want.

Well it shows he did not ask for evidence after he was given the stats. He just explained why he had previously asked for it.
But do what you want. I got better things to worry about. Would just prefer to read discussions about the topic rather than jibes.

[eaglesman]

The second post says "wanted" not "want". Lay off. Move on.

this bloke must battle with the english language as he still does not understand haha

i do not see mcdonald as the terlich/vlastuin as i dont think he has their scoring potential but i see him a shade better than the heath/stevenson ... i feel like i am actually just spending 80k for the sake of it at the moment

[elephants]

The second post says "wanted" not "want". Lay off. Move on.

Thats a bit of a moot point. May as well wait until round 5 to make your team if you want/wanted evidence...
And no, I'll lay where I want.

Well it shows he did not ask for evidence after he was given the stats. He just explained why he had previously asked for it.
But do what you want. I got better things to worry about. Would just prefer to read discussions about the topic rather than jibes.

Thats still irrelevant haha, he can ask all he wants but he's been given the best evidence possible.

The second post says "wanted" not "want". Lay off. Move on.

this bloke must battle with the english language as he still does not understand haha

i do not see mcdonald as the terlich/vlastuin as i dont think he has their scoring potential but i see him a shade better than the heath/stevenson ... i feel like i am actually just spending 80k for the sake of it at the moment

Funny you say that then go make a post with at least 10 grammatical errors. Top stuff ;)

[eaglesman]

The second post says "wanted" not "want". Lay off. Move on.

Thats a bit of a moot point. May as well wait until round 5 to make your team if you want/wanted evidence...
And no, I'll lay where I want.

Well it shows he did not ask for evidence after he was given the stats. He just explained why he had previously asked for it.
But do what you want. I got better things to worry about. Would just prefer to read discussions about the topic rather than jibes.

Thats still irrelevant haha, he can ask all he wants but he's been given the best evidence possible.

The second post says "wanted" not "want". Lay off. Move on.

this bloke must battle with the english language as he still does not understand haha

i do not see mcdonald as the terlich/vlastuin as i dont think he has their scoring potential but i see him a shade better than the heath/stevenson ... i feel like i am actually just spending 80k for the sake of it at the moment

Funny you say that then go make a post with at least 10 grammatical errors. Top stuff ;)

wAsTe Of TiMe TaLkInG tO nO hOpErS ... cIaO

[elephants]

The second post says "wanted" not "want". Lay off. Move on.

Thats a bit of a moot point. May as well wait until round 5 to make your team if you want/wanted evidence...
And no, I'll lay where I want.

Well it shows he did not ask for evidence after he was given the stats. He just explained why he had previously asked for it.
But do what you want. I got better things to worry about. Would just prefer to read discussions about the topic rather than jibes.

Thats still irrelevant haha, he can ask all he wants but he's been given the best evidence possible.

The second post says "wanted" not "want". Lay off. Move on.

this bloke must battle with the english language as he still does not understand haha

i do not see mcdonald as the terlich/vlastuin as i dont think he has their scoring potential but i see him a shade better than the heath/stevenson ... i feel like i am actually just spending 80k for the sake of it at the moment

Funny you say that then go make a post with at least 10 grammatical errors. Top stuff ;)

wAsTe Of TiMe TaLkInG tO nO hOpErS ... cIaO

Yet you have time to reply... Ask yourself, who is the real no-hoper here?

[SydneyRox]

calm down chaps. Lets not get personal here, we are just talking footy