Newest attempt

Started by roti, February 19, 2014, 01:50:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

roti

Hey Lads, liking this team at the moment, would love your thoughts

DEF: Mitchell, Hibberd, Simpson, Hurn, Suckling, McDonald (Fuller, Georgiou)

MID: Ablett, Pendlebury, Watson, Beams, Thomas, Michie, Ellis, Dunstan (Crouch, Robertson)

RUC: Naitanui, Sandilands (Nankervis, King)

FWD: Dangerfield, Martin, Franklin, Pavlich, Fasolo, Kennedy-Harris (Garlett, Impey)

$6,200


AndyWhis

Really like this team. The only thing I don't like is Pavlich but that's a personal thing, not really a judgement of your forward structure.

Rowan1812

Sensational team. Cant fault it.

ben_020285

Quote from: roti on February 19, 2014, 01:50:57 AM
Hey Lads, liking this team at the moment, would love your thoughts

DEF: Mitchell, Hibberd, Simpson, Hurn, Suckling, McDonald (Fuller, Georgiou)

MID: Ablett, Pendlebury, Watson, Beams, Thomas, Michie, Ellis, Dunstan (Crouch, Robertson)

RUC: Naitanui, Sandilands (Nankervis, King)

FWD: Dangerfield, Martin, Franklin, Pavlich, Fasolo, Kennedy-Harris (Garlett, Impey)

$6,200

Looks really good mate but with regards to the byes I think that having all of Mitchell, Simpson, Hurn and Suckling sharing the round 9 bye is a bit of a worry.

Aside from that I really can't fault it. Well done.

sammy123

great team cant fault it at all

johnnytheboy1

Def:Great defence like the pick of Hurn
Mids: Great Midfield Ellis played a great game yesterday
Rucks If Nic Nat is fit for the start of the season will do well
Fwds: IF Pavlich can stay fit his scores won't drop but have a feeling he might drop see how he goes in the first 2 rounds before making your decision.

Summary: Looks a great team which i rate highly 9/10

Jacko

Looking good mate, not a huge fan of Hibberd personally, maybe look at Hanley instead?
Other than that great team.

roti

Thanks fellas, interested in your thoughts on Watson/Hurn as compared too Murphy/McVeigh. I've had the latter for most of the pre-season but murph didn't look too flashy from what I saw of the NAB cup.

GoLions

Quote from: roti on February 20, 2014, 04:04:40 PM
Thanks fellas, interested in your thoughts on Watson/Hurn as compared too Murphy/McVeigh. I've had the latter for most of the pre-season but murph didn't look too flashy from what I saw of the NAB cup.
Watson should average 115, maybe pushing towards 120. Murphy about 105, pushing towards 110. So at least a 10 point difference there.
Hurn averaged 95 taking out his injured game last year where he only scored 8, and I think will go about the same this year. McVeigh I believe will drop off to about a 100 average, so only a 5 point difference there.

So Watson (115) + Hurn (95) gives 210 ppg
And Murphy (105) + McVeigh (100) gives 205 ppg

I'd go with Watson and Hurn :)

tor01doc

Good team but have 'Plan B' at the ready because I think this year will be hard to get a full hand of cheap rookies.

Like Watson/Hurn.

Like Hibberd.

HotTiges

looks good mate, similar side to myself. Fasolo is a tough one, looking at him but not sure where he fits into Coll's best 22.Cheapy though so monitor.Got Pav myself and a bit undecided what to with him. Good price, but he is slowly declining..