Help a brother out - Too many uniques???

[dcmagadia21]

DEF: Mitchell, Enright, Hibberd, Swallow, Suckling, McDonald - Howard, Laidler
MID: Ablett, Jack, Ebert, Redden, Beams, Greene, Michie, Polec - Ellis, Honeychurch
RUC: Mumford, Sandilands - Currie, Thurlow
FWD: Dangerfield, Martin, Kennedy, Gunston, Caddy, Rohan - Lloyd, Kersten
$13,800 left

I classify Enright, Hibberd, Jack, Ebert, Redden, Greene, Mumford, Kennedy and Gunston as uniques but do you think I have too many uniques? Like will it cost me in the long run or is it good to have good uniques at this stage?

[thefuzz]

Uniques are good, but you don't need them just to be different. Only get a unique if you see an upside that no one else does.
Hibberd and Enright will both be top 10 backs surely so they are fine. Enright will get rested though I would imagine to be prepared for that.
I don't see any point in Ebert personally; although you might and if you do then great go for it! Personally I would take Cotchin over Ebert everyday, far more upside. Jack will also be a top 10/15 mid so I have no problems with that.
Redden has a lot of upside, a lot of potential, he does fine I think if you wanted a unique option. I don't think you need Greene there, too much risk, either got to Ellis or go to a rookie I reckon.
I love Gunston but I will make him an upgrade target to wait and see if not having Buddy there changes his scoring for the worse.