Risky in defence but stronger in mids?

[Coxy10]

B: P. Hanley, K. Simpson, G. Birchall, M. Suckling, M. Scharenberg, L. McDonald (J. Bews, D. Van Unen)

M: S. Pendlebury, J. Selwood, J. Watson, T. Cotchin, M. Murphy, D. Beams, D. Tyson, C. Beams (J. Martin, M. Crouch)

R: M. Kreuzer, A. Sandilands (D. Currie, L. McBean)

F: T. Rockliff, D. Martin, N. Naitanui, D. Thomas, P. Karnezis, V. Michie (J. Hogan, S. Kersten)

Salary Remaining: $22,300
Bye Structure: 11/7/10

[Ricochet]

Love this mate. You've got a really good balance of risk and rock solid premos. Don't think your backline is too risky at all.
Only concern would be no Ablett but your mids are still super strong.

[Holz]

The issue will be when rocky and nic Nat both lose their forward status. Hanley might lose defence.

The defence is pretty reasonable.

[GoLions]

Really like your backline
Mids look really good
Ruck looks good
Forwards good

Wouldn't change it as long as it is affordable

The issue will be when rocky and nic Nat both lose their forward status. Hanley might lose defence.

The defence is pretty reasonable.

I really want Rockliff to lose DPP, as I have him locked in either way and would become a great POD. Honestly think he might keep it though.