Main Menu

Freo welcome pick #17 Michael Apeness

Started by valkorum, November 21, 2013, 09:25:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

valkorum


Ricochet

I was really hoping for Acres with our first pick but key fwds are a priority atm. Don't honestly know much about Apeness but he looks pretty impressive from his bio

valkorum

From what I can tell he was the Boyd replacement for the Eastern Ranges when he went down with injury.  At 200cm and 98kg he already has an AFL sized body - just needs to build his strength.

Nige

I was a tad surprised, but at the same time, I did kind of expect it.

He'll be a good player.

valkorum

Quote from: NigeyS on November 22, 2013, 11:37:24 AM
I was a tad surprised, but at the same time, I did kind of expect it.

He'll be a good player.

Not really - he was the #3 big in the draft behind Boyd and McCarthy.  Both of them were gone at our pick so we took the next best big.

Nige

I thought you may have taken Blake Acres which is why I said what I did.

But yeah, they addressed a need which is always good and yep, he was next in line.

I still can't believe the Giants took Cam McCarthy.  :o

Ricochet

Rugby background as well. Should bring a fair bit of aggression

valkorum

Quote from: NigeyS on November 22, 2013, 12:17:50 PM
I thought you may have taken Blake Acres which is why I said what I did.

But yeah, they addressed a need which is always good and yep, he was next in line.

I still can't believe the Giants took Cam McCarthy.  :o

We dont really need another midfielder so Acres wasnt required. 

I was annoyed when GWS took McCarthy - they now have Patton, Boyd, Cameron and McCarthy.  How the hell are they going to play all 4 of them.

T Dog

Quote from: valkorum on November 22, 2013, 12:31:54 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on November 22, 2013, 12:17:50 PM
I thought you may have taken Blake Acres which is why I said what I did.

But yeah, they addressed a need which is always good and yep, he was next in line.

I still can't believe the Giants took Cam McCarthy.  :o

We dont really need another midfielder so Acres wasnt required. 

I was annoyed when GWS took McCarthy - they now have Patton, Boyd, Cameron and McCarthy.  How the hell are they going to play all 4 of them.

Future trade bait for ready made backs?

valkorum


Cicjose

Quote from: valkorum on November 22, 2013, 12:31:54 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on November 22, 2013, 12:17:50 PM
I thought you may have taken Blake Acres which is why I said what I did.

But yeah, they addressed a need which is always good and yep, he was next in line.

I still can't believe the Giants took Cam McCarthy.  :o

We dont really need another midfielder so Acres wasnt required. 

I was annoyed when GWS took McCarthy - they now have Patton, Boyd, Cameron and McCarthy.  How the hell are they going to play all 4 of them.

^ this

Ziplock

They might be planning on trying mccarthy down back, or preparing if they think patton will leave.