Happy with starting line up not sure about the kids?

Started by jamolicious, March 09, 2010, 02:32:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

jamolicious


B       Shaw, H            Hodge, L          Cornes, C          Gibson, J   

         Malceski, N        Hunt, J             Gillies, T           

        Maguire, M       Trengove, J



M      Pendlebury, S    Selwood, J       Cooney, A           Ball, L   

        McVeigh, M         Dangerfield, P  Rohan, G          Jetta, L



R       Sandilands, A    Charman, J      Skipper, W       Currie, D



F          Riewoldt, N      Pavlich, M        Harvey, B        Hall, B

            Murphy, R        Medhurst, P    Warren, B       Hicks, R

           Rockliff, T


jamolicious


c4v3m4n

#2
Wow, now theres a different team!  :o But dont worry its good thing....

Lets see now...

Backs - Not bad, love the uniqueness in Gibson and Gillies. I think you may struggle without an Enright, Goodwin or Goddard though.

Midfield.  :o Without a certain captain in an Ablett, Swan or Montagna, you're gonna struggle...apart from that its not that bad.

Rucks - Charman probably isnt #2 ruckman material. IMO, Seaby or Nic Nat would be a better choice.

Forward - Not bad either. Medhurst is a unique inclusion.

In conclusion,

1. Downgrade Dangerfield to a rookie, plenty out there.
2. Use that money to strengthen your backs and midfield.

Not a bad start, happy supercoaching and good luck!

madskill55

No Dustin Martin as a rookie in the mid, might be a revelation and a massive cash cow this year if all goes well with him at the tigs. J.Roughead instead of D.Curries as ruck. Get D.Stewart (PA)  or Posaidly (Geel) for R.Hicks. The starting players is a quite a decent solid team mate.  Personally i would put danger in the fwd line for eiether warren or medhurst. Get D.Martin on the field in ur midfield. Ull save up some cash there. Not sure about T.Gillies- id go for a bit more of a risk and get waters and trade him up later in the season. Risky on charman, id get even a seaby/nic nat type of 2nd ruckman if u can afford it. Other than tht it looks good as