Danny Stanley

Started by browncow1, August 30, 2013, 10:35:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

browncow1

Would be interested to hear peoples thoughts on Danny Stanley as a point of difference in the backline this week.

Seems to be getting more of a run on the ball the recently, and is coming off scores of 106 and 109. Was ultra consistent last season, and I had him locked in my team over the pre-season. Only owned by 1.3% of people, so is very unique, but is this for an obvious reason?

Thoughts would be much appreciated.

toonheart

Was looking at him as well, Currently thinking Hibberd -> Stanley and this point.

He scored 108 last time the Suns played the Giants at Metricon as well

jamfrank

I'm tossing up between Stanley and Danyle Pearce. With no Fyfe or Mundy, he's been named on the ball, Pearce could go big...

gstarm

Got stanley as a POD who is also named on the ball.
;)

pommyadam

was tempted to bring Stanley in last week

went for RMurphy instead
i wish i went with my gut, rather than FF

browncow1

Quote from: jamfrank on August 30, 2013, 12:48:14 PM
I'm tossing up between Stanley and Danyle Pearce. With no Fyfe or Mundy, he's been named on the ball, Pearce could go big...

Or could cop the Clint Jones tag?
Actually, on the Clint Jones tag, does anyone think he may go to Barlow with Mundy, Fyfe and Hill out?

Rusty00

Quote from: jamfrank on August 30, 2013, 12:48:14 PM
I'm tossing up between Stanley and Danyle Pearce. With no Fyfe or Mundy, he's been named on the ball, Pearce could go big...
May also mean he cops a tag with no Fyfe or Mundy.

jamfrank

Quote from: Rusty00 on August 30, 2013, 02:30:05 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on August 30, 2013, 12:48:14 PM
I'm tossing up between Stanley and Danyle Pearce. With no Fyfe or Mundy, he's been named on the ball, Pearce could go big...
May also mean he cops a tag with no Fyfe or Mundy.

True that. That'd be good: my opponent has him. Who's the defender to get then? I'm thinking Stanley or Bob Murphy now.

Rusty00

Quote from: jamfrank on August 30, 2013, 02:37:47 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on August 30, 2013, 02:30:05 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on August 30, 2013, 12:48:14 PM
I'm tossing up between Stanley and Danyle Pearce. With no Fyfe or Mundy, he's been named on the ball, Pearce could go big...
May also mean he cops a tag with no Fyfe or Mundy.

True that. That'd be good: my opponent has him. Who's the defender to get then? I'm thinking Stanley or Bob Murphy now.
Who are your other defenders? I picked up O'Brien last week as a bit of a POD. Has scored 3 hundreds and hasn't gone below 90 since he returned from his time off.

jamfrank

Quote from: Rusty00 on August 30, 2013, 03:08:45 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on August 30, 2013, 02:37:47 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on August 30, 2013, 02:30:05 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on August 30, 2013, 12:48:14 PM
I'm tossing up between Stanley and Danyle Pearce. With no Fyfe or Mundy, he's been named on the ball, Pearce could go big...
May also mean he cops a tag with no Fyfe or Mundy.

True that. That'd be good: my opponent has him. Who's the defender to get then? I'm thinking Stanley or Bob Murphy now.
Who are your other defenders? I picked up O'Brien last week as a bit of a POD. Has scored 3 hundreds and hasn't gone below 90 since he returned from his time off.

Goddard, Enright, Gibbs, Shaw, Ellis, McKenzie, Heppell and Staker.

Maybe Harry O is the way to go....my opponent also has him...

Rusty00

Quote from: jamfrank on August 30, 2013, 03:25:49 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on August 30, 2013, 03:08:45 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on August 30, 2013, 02:37:47 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on August 30, 2013, 02:30:05 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on August 30, 2013, 12:48:14 PM
I'm tossing up between Stanley and Danyle Pearce. With no Fyfe or Mundy, he's been named on the ball, Pearce could go big...
May also mean he cops a tag with no Fyfe or Mundy.

True that. That'd be good: my opponent has him. Who's the defender to get then? I'm thinking Stanley or Bob Murphy now.
Who are your other defenders? I picked up O'Brien last week as a bit of a POD. Has scored 3 hundreds and hasn't gone below 90 since he returned from his time off.

Goddard, Enright, Gibbs, Shaw, Ellis, McKenzie, Heppell and Staker.

Maybe Harry O is the way to go....my opponent also has him...
So you're going to trade Heppell and bench the Cannon? The defenders I would be picking from are O'Brien, Murphy, Stanley.

jamfrank

Quote from: Rusty00 on August 30, 2013, 03:49:41 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on August 30, 2013, 03:25:49 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on August 30, 2013, 03:08:45 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on August 30, 2013, 02:37:47 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on August 30, 2013, 02:30:05 PM
Quote from: jamfrank on August 30, 2013, 12:48:14 PM
I'm tossing up between Stanley and Danyle Pearce. With no Fyfe or Mundy, he's been named on the ball, Pearce could go big...
May also mean he cops a tag with no Fyfe or Mundy.

True that. That'd be good: my opponent has him. Who's the defender to get then? I'm thinking Stanley or Bob Murphy now.
Who are your other defenders? I picked up O'Brien last week as a bit of a POD. Has scored 3 hundreds and hasn't gone below 90 since he returned from his time off.

Goddard, Enright, Gibbs, Shaw, Ellis, McKenzie, Heppell and Staker.

Maybe Harry O is the way to go....my opponent also has him...
So you're going to trade Heppell and bench the Cannon? The defenders I would be picking from are O'Brien, Murphy, Stanley.

I think I'm actually going to bench Gibbs. I'm going with O'Brien.

steve99

Quote from: toonheart on August 30, 2013, 10:55:40 AM
Was looking at him as well, Currently thinking Hibberd -> Stanley and this point.

He scored 108 last time the Suns played the Giants at Metricon as well

Hibberd went 113 at the G against Richmond earlier this year....