T Mitchell v Crouch: who is better bench coverage?

[Blues Blues Blues]

I had been planning on keeping T Mitchell as M9, but Crouch's recent form has me thinking he could hold that spot just as well. Plus, Upgrading Mitchell instead of Crouch gives me more cash to finish midfield.

Thoughts?

[tkringle]

Would like to see output from Crouch with Danger back first.

[ben_020285]

T Mitchell is definitely better bench coverage. He hasn't dipped below 80 all season and has tonned up 50% of the time.

He is a first year player but I wouldn't be too worried about him burning out as he is actually 20 years old.

[shorty3264]

Yeh Tom Mitchell for sure. Can't see him being rested, he's been dying to play AFL footy for a long long time.

[j959]

Would like to see output from Crouch with Danger back first.

+1 - if you don't have to trade them now (ie to cover a donut) I would wait ... both still likley to increase in value - trades are gold at this time of year!!!  ;)

[Blues Blues Blues]

Crouch is really impressing me, and with T Mitchell's higher price I'm thinking of going with my gut and upgrading him and keeping Crouch as M9. Thoughts after this week? Looked good even with Danger back.

And don't get me started on JPK  >:(

[MC]

Crouch is a gun, but with the tag headed to Mitchell it shows the respect other teams have given him. I wouldn't bank on a tag for Mitchell again, especially with Jack, Kennedy and Hannebury running around the midfield.  Mitchell will be more solid as bench cover, however he'll make a handy profit if you need some cash!

[Blues Blues Blues]

Crouch is a gun, but with the tag headed to Mitchell it shows the respect other teams have given him. I wouldn't bank on a tag for Mitchell again, especially with Jack, Kennedy and Hannebury running around the midfield.  Mitchell will be more solid as bench cover, however he'll make a handy profit if you need some cash!

The way some of my spuds are going I'll need every dollar I can get