SIPOSS VS KARNY

[stew42]

why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out

hahaha so fair

because I have faith. Karny and siposs still have potential im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)

Trading out Dangerfield is worse than Karny and Siposs. Karny and Siposs were in your team just to make cash... They did not... SO IT'S LOGICAL TO TRADE THEM OUT BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT DOING THEIR JOB, WHILST THERE WERE CHEAPER ROOKS WHO WERE MAKING THE DOUGH!!!!

Dangerfield you paid $525k for... He was a premium choice.... He was suppose to stay in your team for the remainder of the season.. If you traded a premium after one game your a flowering f8gg8t!!! You are the definition of "someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game", Your a dog kent. You could have picked JPK, Selwood, Murphy, Redden or Swallow... YOu chose Danger because you obviously thought irrationally that he would perform better... If you traded him out after his 2nd game I'd still think you are a f*g, If you traded him out after his 3rd I'd have respect... You traded him out after one game, where he had the flu and was heavily tagged, also the game wasn't dream team friendly... I call dog!!! What good is a dream teamer who doesn't even have faith in his own premium choices. I haven't traded one of my premium mids out because I'm not a re and got players who I knew would perform.

So I conclude out of the two of us, I'm the one with faith in my players!!!
Court Adjourned

Come on mate you seriously need to back off with the personal attacks. You don't know what people's strategies are or any other problems people have with their team that required them to use the two trades.

Round 1 Dangerfield gets 51 (and averages 80 over the first 3 rounds) and Siposs gets 80 as a fwd. I probably would have traded Danger out over Siposs as well. He copped a hard tag and couldn't handle it. Plus he has had one breakout year and can't be considered a true premium yet. And to say FARK should have gotten rid of Siposs and Karny earlier when you don't know what other trades he has done is unfair. I'd like three trades this week for Zorko, Kruezer and Varcoe but I don't have them.

A lot of what you post is correct mate but you really need to tone it down.

haha I'm sorry I haven't really had the chance to feel any empathy yet this season as the only trade I have been forced to composed so far have been discarding Zorko (easy trade to Stevie J) and Karny (also an easy trade to Dwyer). You guys are right I should of seen it through 'The F.A.R.K's' perspective before commenting I can't know what problems he could of had with his team. But I stand by my policy of trading premium midfielders. It is logically correct to trade out a premium mid who isn't performing but it is ethically and morally wrong in my opinion as they are the players you specifically have chosen over all others to carry your team, the backbone if you will

Really? Bro, do you even philosophise?

[powersuperkents]

why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out

hahaha so fair

because I have faith. Karny and siposs still have potential im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)

Trading out Dangerfield is worse than Karny and Siposs. Karny and Siposs were in your team just to make cash... They did not... SO IT'S LOGICAL TO TRADE THEM OUT BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT DOING THEIR JOB, WHILST THERE WERE CHEAPER ROOKS WHO WERE MAKING THE DOUGH!!!!

Dangerfield you paid $525k for... He was a premium choice.... He was suppose to stay in your team for the remainder of the season.. If you traded a premium after one game your a flowering f8gg8t!!! You are the definition of "someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game", Your a dog kent. You could have picked JPK, Selwood, Murphy, Redden or Swallow... YOu chose Danger because you obviously thought irrationally that he would perform better... If you traded him out after his 2nd game I'd still think you are a f*g, If you traded him out after his 3rd I'd have respect... You traded him out after one game, where he had the flu and was heavily tagged, also the game wasn't dream team friendly... I call dog!!! What good is a dream teamer who doesn't even have faith in his own premium choices. I haven't traded one of my premium mids out because I'm not a re and got players who I knew would perform.

So I conclude out of the two of us, I'm the one with faith in my players!!!
Court Adjourned

Come on mate you seriously need to back off with the personal attacks. You don't know what people's strategies are or any other problems people have with their team that required them to use the two trades.

Round 1 Dangerfield gets 51 (and averages 80 over the first 3 rounds) and Siposs gets 80 as a fwd. I probably would have traded Danger out over Siposs as well. He copped a hard tag and couldn't handle it. Plus he has had one breakout year and can't be considered a true premium yet. And to say FARK should have gotten rid of Siposs and Karny earlier when you don't know what other trades he has done is unfair. I'd like three trades this week for Zorko, Kruezer and Varcoe but I don't have them.

A lot of what you post is correct mate but you really need to tone it down.

haha I'm sorry I haven't really had the chance to feel any empathy yet this season as the only trade I have been forced to composed so far have been discarding Zorko (easy trade to Stevie J) and Karny (also an easy trade to Dwyer). You guys are right I should of seen it through 'The F.A.R.K's' perspective before commenting I can't know what problems he could of had with his team. But I stand by my policy of trading premium midfielders. It is logically correct to trade out a premium mid who isn't performing but it is ethically and morally wrong in my opinion as they are the players you specifically have chosen over all others to carry your team, the backbone if you will

Really? Bro, do you even philosophise?

In Dream team I would consider picking your premium players philosophising. You take statistics, facts, variables, appeal, personal reference and most importantly faith into account when purchasing a player at $500k+. People who just throw in any premium without thought either has no dream team experience, doesn't care or is just an idiot. You pick a premium because they are the players who you think will be the top dogs come seasons end. I picked Cotchin over a much more proven Lids because I had faith he would be better. I picked Watson over Stants because I had faith he would be better (still do, the 65 was only one game out of twenty-two), I picked Pendles over Cotchin originally because I had faith he would be better and I found room to turn Redden into Cotchin because like the other decisions I didn't want to start without him because I had faith he would be better. Arguably I was right about every single decision (arguably referring to Watson>Stanton (Watson will still flower the showerhead up!). I didn't get side tracked by irrational decisions like JPK, Dangerfield, Scooter & Swallow and pick them on personal preference alone (I sometimes wish I got sidetracked by Swallow, but I would prefer everyone of my premium picks over in the midfield over Swallow 7 days a week) unlike most people and in most case (nearly all) they got flowered up by not thinking logically (Andrew Swallow can't be used to rebut because before this week only 7.11% of teams had him, now 9.19% do). Swallow by season's end won't beat Swan, GAJ, Pendles, Cotchin or Watson so I'm happy with it. But my conclusion is when you pick a midfield do it according to math and logic and a little bit of emotion and personal preference not a full blown rush of inclination. Most importantly it's a waste of time to make stupid ass decisions and then ask for help to a problem that easy. If there was a slight bit of logic you would just go Danger -> Proven Premium not bother other people for answer thus not learning anything from your mistake. It is acceptable to seek help for upgrades or downgrades in the midfield but if it's sideways trading flower off and use common sense too not make the same stupid emotionally based decisions (eg. people bringing in Kane Cornes etc. (I wouldn't even consider bringing in Swallow based on 3 rounds over a proven players like Stanton, Deledio etc an emotionally based decision (don't get me wrong he'll do well but he should be an upgrade target so you have more time to assess). Now after going through all that thought and process to selecting your midfield answer me, is it unethical to just throw them under the bus after one or two rounds because they didn't reach your unrealistic expectations? People picked these players for a reason so why not see if they can fulfill it instead of being grade A dog kents and sooking after one or two poor (realistic (Dangerfield got 51, 95 & 95 (an average game for him if you have a clear and logical mindset (he is a POD and that's why people picked him occasional scores of 50-70 are expected) performances and dumping them for someone who has had what could be nothing more than a good start to the season...         

Overall dumping your premium midfield players is the most notorious dog act in dream team

[Ricochet]

why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out

hahaha so fair

because I have faith. Karny and siposs still have potential im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)

Trading out Dangerfield is worse than Karny and Siposs. Karny and Siposs were in your team just to make cash... They did not... SO IT'S LOGICAL TO TRADE THEM OUT BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT DOING THEIR JOB, WHILST THERE WERE CHEAPER ROOKS WHO WERE MAKING THE DOUGH!!!!

Dangerfield you paid $525k for... He was a premium choice.... He was suppose to stay in your team for the remainder of the season.. If you traded a premium after one game your a flowering f8gg8t!!! You are the definition of "someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game", Your a dog kent. You could have picked JPK, Selwood, Murphy, Redden or Swallow... YOu chose Danger because you obviously thought irrationally that he would perform better... If you traded him out after his 2nd game I'd still think you are a f*g, If you traded him out after his 3rd I'd have respect... You traded him out after one game, where he had the flu and was heavily tagged, also the game wasn't dream team friendly... I call dog!!! What good is a dream teamer who doesn't even have faith in his own premium choices. I haven't traded one of my premium mids out because I'm not a re and got players who I knew would perform.

So I conclude out of the two of us, I'm the one with faith in my players!!!
Court Adjourned

Come on mate you seriously need to back off with the personal attacks. You don't know what people's strategies are or any other problems people have with their team that required them to use the two trades.

Round 1 Dangerfield gets 51 (and averages 80 over the first 3 rounds) and Siposs gets 80 as a fwd. I probably would have traded Danger out over Siposs as well. He copped a hard tag and couldn't handle it. Plus he has had one breakout year and can't be considered a true premium yet. And to say FARK should have gotten rid of Siposs and Karny earlier when you don't know what other trades he has done is unfair. I'd like three trades this week for Zorko, Kruezer and Varcoe but I don't have them.

A lot of what you post is correct mate but you really need to tone it down.

haha I'm sorry I haven't really had the chance to feel any empathy yet this season as the only trade I have been forced to composed so far have been discarding Zorko (easy trade to Stevie J) and Karny (also an easy trade to Dwyer). You guys are right I should of seen it through 'The F.A.R.K's' perspective before commenting I can't know what problems he could of had with his team. But I stand by my policy of trading premium midfielders. It is logically correct to trade out a premium mid who isn't performing but it is ethically and morally wrong in my opinion as they are the players you specifically have chosen over all others to carry your team, the backbone if you will

Really? Bro, do you even philosophise?

In Dream team I would consider picking your premium players philosophising. You take statistics, facts, variables, appeal, personal reference and most importantly faith into account when purchasing a player at $500k+. People who just throw in any premium without thought either has no dream team experience, doesn't care or is just an idiot. You pick a premium because they are the players who you think will be the top dogs come seasons end. I picked Cotchin over a much more proven Lids because I had faith he would be better. I picked Watson over Stants because I had faith he would be better (still do, the 65 was only one game out of twenty-two), I picked Pendles over Cotchin originally because I had faith he would be better and I found room to turn Redden into Cotchin because like the other decisions I didn't want to start without him because I had faith he would be better. Arguably I was right about every single decision (arguably referring to Watson>Stanton (Watson will still flower the showerhead up!). I didn't get side tracked by irrational decisions like JPK, Dangerfield, Scooter & Swallow and pick them on personal preference alone (I sometimes wish I got sidetracked by Swallow, but I would prefer everyone of my premium picks over in the midfield over Swallow 7 days a week) unlike most people and in most case (nearly all) they got flowered up by not thinking logically (Andrew Swallow can't be used to rebut because before this week only 7.11% of teams had him, now 9.19% do). Swallow by season's end won't beat Swan, GAJ, Pendles, Cotchin or Watson so I'm happy with it. But my conclusion is when you pick a midfield do it according to math and logic and a little bit of emotion and personal preference not a full blown rush of inclination. Most importantly it's a waste of time to make stupid ass decisions and then ask for help to a problem that easy. If there was a slight bit of logic you would just go Danger -> Proven Premium not bother other people for answer thus not learning anything from your mistake. It is acceptable to seek help for upgrades or downgrades in the midfield but if it's sideways trading flower off and use common sense too not make the same stupid emotionally based decisions (eg. people bringing in Kane Cornes etc. (I wouldn't even consider bringing in Swallow based on 3 rounds over a proven players like Stanton, Deledio etc an emotionally based decision (don't get me wrong he'll do well but he should be an upgrade target so you have more time to assess). Now after going through all that thought and process to selecting your midfield answer me, is it unethical to just throw them under the bus after one or two rounds because they didn't reach your unrealistic expectations? People picked these players for a reason so why not see if they can fulfill it instead of being grade A dog kents and sooking after one or two poor (realistic (Dangerfield got 51, 95 & 95 (an average game for him if you have a clear and logical mindset (he is a POD and that's why people picked him occasional scores of 50-70 are expected) performances and dumping them for someone who has had what could be nothing more than a good start to the season...         

Overall dumping your premium midfield players is the most notorious dog act in dream team

Not necessarily anymore mate. With two trades a week they can be used to make cash and upgrade other areas. Say he started with Dangerfield and saw his 50dd in the first round. With nothing else needed in his team to change he traded to Swallow.
Swallow is averaging 126 and went up 28k
Danger is averaging 80 and dropped 29k
Every team and situation is different and the new trading rules have changed the old school theories.

[turry17]

There is no morals in dream team, to much carnage happening to try and be morally correct  ;D :P

[powersuperkents]

why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out

hahaha so fair

because I have faith. Karny and siposs still have potential im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)

Trading out Dangerfield is worse than Karny and Siposs. Karny and Siposs were in your team just to make cash... They did not... SO IT'S LOGICAL TO TRADE THEM OUT BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT DOING THEIR JOB, WHILST THERE WERE CHEAPER ROOKS WHO WERE MAKING THE DOUGH!!!!

Dangerfield you paid $525k for... He was a premium choice.... He was suppose to stay in your team for the remainder of the season.. If you traded a premium after one game your a flowering f8gg8t!!! You are the definition of "someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game", Your a dog kent. You could have picked JPK, Selwood, Murphy, Redden or Swallow... YOu chose Danger because you obviously thought irrationally that he would perform better... If you traded him out after his 2nd game I'd still think you are a f*g, If you traded him out after his 3rd I'd have respect... You traded him out after one game, where he had the flu and was heavily tagged, also the game wasn't dream team friendly... I call dog!!! What good is a dream teamer who doesn't even have faith in his own premium choices. I haven't traded one of my premium mids out because I'm not a re and got players who I knew would perform.

So I conclude out of the two of us, I'm the one with faith in my players!!!
Court Adjourned

I bought dangerfield solely for the fact crows had 7 of the first 11 games at home and dangers an aami specialist. I didmt like danger to begin with i traded him outta our euros team preseason. When i saw him cop a huge tag in round 1 i knew home ganes meant shower all and he would be copping a tag weekly so i traded him to wines pocketing 350+k and wines has ave more than danger since

So flower off you tossbag your a genuine White Goodman that makes this forum shower

I'm sorry but my insult was clearly your fault if you had been more clear that you had traded Dangerfield out preseason I wouldn't of posted that to begin with. My only issue is trading out a premium player after round 1 begins. Trading out a player before the season even starts isn't even trading... It's selecting a player and then removing them... "i traded him outta our euros team preseason" makes slight sense just because of the word preseason. Don't use the word trade because that implies that you used one of your 44 trades to remove him when you didn't, the fact is you never had Dangerfield in your team to begin with (your team is the 30 players selected when the first lockout commences). You stated "im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)" clearly misleading me to believe that Dangerfield was in your round one team and scored 51, when the fact was he was place-holding a position in your team in P3 against Carlton where he scored 61 and stated you "saw him cop a huge tag". It was not unreasonable to believe that you were an immoral player because who did state the words "trade" and "1 shower game" which too you may mean P3, but too anyone else I guarantee you would have misinterpreted this statement as a reference to round 1 and Danger's score of 51.

Statement No. 1:
because I have faith. Karny and siposs still have potential im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)
'Seems like an obvious reference to round 1 and Dangers performance of 51'

Statement No. 2:
I bought dangerfield solely for the fact crows had 7 of the first 11 games at home and dangers an aami specialist. I didmt like danger to begin with i traded him outta our euros team preseason. When i saw him cop a huge tag in round 1 i knew home ganes meant shower all and he would be copping a tag weekly so i traded him to wines pocketing 350+k and wines has ave more than danger since

So flower off you tossbag your a genuine White Goodman that makes this forum shower
'Could be interpreted both ways, the use of the word "brought" implying the purchase made after the first lockout, the use of the word "trade" referring to using one of the 44 trades provided this season. "cop a huge tag" can refer to either P3 (as mentioned above) or R1 (as mentioned above). Finally the statement that you "traded him to wines pocketing 350+k" implies using one of the 44 trades to downgrade to Oliver Wines or conversely 'remove' Dangerfield and 'add' Wines which doesn't cost 1 of the 44 trades thus not meaning you traded Dangerfield out... 

The truth is you aren't an immoral player and you are not subject too 'the dog dreamteamer' type as you hadn't actually traded out a premium midfielder (also referred to as 'dogged a premo') :). However the fact remains that if you had a decent linguistic skills I would have been able to comprehend what you were implying. The fact you don't left me and most likely everyone else under the impression you were alluding to round 1, and if still you are referring to round 1 your two statements contradict each other continuing to render my proposal for you to receive English lessons valid...

I close my case on the terms that none of this disruption would have occurred if 'The F.A.R.K' could communicate more clearly with a more concise dialect and a better understanding of semantics. I propose that 'The F.A.R.K' takes up remedial English lessons in his spare time and that he drafts all further postings on the forums. In conclusion it is not the common dream teamer like me who "makes this forum shower", it is the common minded person like 'the F.A.R.K'. My case rests on the argument that none of this hostile debate would have occurred if 'The F.A.R.K' communicated more clearly thus exhibiting himself to be quite the loyal dream teamer. His failure to do this depicted him as a "dog kent" therefore concluding with the question, am I really what 'The F.A.R.K' refers to as a"tossbag" in this incident? Am I not acting out of reasonable judgement? You have a lot to think about but finally, "FLOWER OFF" THE F.A.R.K!! You're "a genuine White Goodman" who can't properly correspond with others because your shower English (no offence if you're an immigrant) and you cannot lay fault on someone else who could not identify what you implied because you are so hindered that your statements don't even make sense.Flowering flower bag

[Adamant]

why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out

hahaha so fair

because I have faith. Karny and siposs still have potential im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)

Trading out Dangerfield is worse than Karny and Siposs. Karny and Siposs were in your team just to make cash... They did not... SO IT'S LOGICAL TO TRADE THEM OUT BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT DOING THEIR JOB, WHILST THERE WERE CHEAPER ROOKS WHO WERE MAKING THE DOUGH!!!!

Dangerfield you paid $525k for... He was a premium choice.... He was suppose to stay in your team for the remainder of the season.. If you traded a premium after one game your a flowering f8gg8t!!! You are the definition of "someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game", Your a dog kent. You could have picked JPK, Selwood, Murphy, Redden or Swallow... YOu chose Danger because you obviously thought irrationally that he would perform better... If you traded him out after his 2nd game I'd still think you are a f*g, If you traded him out after his 3rd I'd have respect... You traded him out after one game, where he had the flu and was heavily tagged, also the game wasn't dream team friendly... I call dog!!! What good is a dream teamer who doesn't even have faith in his own premium choices. I haven't traded one of my premium mids out because I'm not a re and got players who I knew would perform.

So I conclude out of the two of us, I'm the one with faith in my players!!!
Court Adjourned

I bought dangerfield solely for the fact crows had 7 of the first 11 games at home and dangers an aami specialist. I didmt like danger to begin with i traded him outta our euros team preseason. When i saw him cop a huge tag in round 1 i knew home ganes meant shower all and he would be copping a tag weekly so i traded him to wines pocketing 350+k and wines has ave more than danger since

So flower off you tossbag your a genuine White Goodman that makes this forum shower

I'm sorry but my insult was clearly your fault if you had been more clear that you had traded Dangerfield out preseason I wouldn't of posted that to begin with. My only issue is trading out a premium player after round 1 begins. Trading out a player before the season even starts isn't even trading... It's selecting a player and then removing them... "i traded him outta our euros team preseason" makes slight sense just because of the word preseason. Don't use the word trade because that implies that you used one of your 44 trades to remove him when you didn't, the fact is you never had Dangerfield in your team to begin with (your team is the 30 players selected when the first lockout commences). You stated "im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)" clearly misleading me to believe that Dangerfield was in your round one team and scored 51, when the fact was he was place-holding a position in your team in P3 against Carlton where he scored 61 and stated you "saw him cop a huge tag". It was not unreasonable to believe that you were an immoral player because who did state the words "trade" and "1 shower game" which too you may mean P3, but too anyone else I guarantee you would have misinterpreted this statement as a reference to round 1 and Danger's score of 51.

Statement No. 1:
because I have faith. Karny and siposs still have potential im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)
'Seems like an obvious reference to round 1 and Dangers performance of 51'

Statement No. 2:
I bought dangerfield solely for the fact crows had 7 of the first 11 games at home and dangers an aami specialist. I didmt like danger to begin with i traded him outta our euros team preseason. When i saw him cop a huge tag in round 1 i knew home ganes meant shower all and he would be copping a tag weekly so i traded him to wines pocketing 350+k and wines has ave more than danger since

So flower off you tossbag your a genuine White Goodman that makes this forum shower
'Could be interpreted both ways, the use of the word "brought" implying the purchase made after the first lockout, the use of the word "trade" referring to using one of the 44 trades provided this season. "cop a huge tag" can refer to either P3 (as mentioned above) or R1 (as mentioned above). Finally the statement "I traded him to wines pocketing 350+k" implies using one of the 44 trades to downgrade to Oliver Wines or conversely 'remove' Dangerfield and 'add' Wines which doesn't cost 1 or the 44 trades thus not meaning you traded Dangerfield out... 

The truth is you aren't an immoral player and you are not subject too 'the dog dreamteamer' type as you hadn't actually traded out a premium midfielder (also referred to as 'dogged a premo') :). However the fact remains that if you had a decent linguistic skills I would have been able to comprehend what you were implying. The fact you don't left me and most likely everyone else under the impression you were alluding to round 1, and if still you are referring to round 1 your two statements contradict each other continuing to render my proposal for you to receive English lessons valid...

I close my case on the terms that none of this disruption would have occurred if 'The F.A.R.K' could communicate more clearly with a more concise dialect and a better understanding of semantics. I propose that 'The F.A.R.K' takes up remedial English lessons in his spare time and that he drafts all further postings on the forums. In conclusion it is not the common dream teamer like me who "makes this forum shower", it is the common minded person like 'the F.A.R.K'. My case rests on the argument that none of this hostile debate would have occurred if 'The F.A.R.K' communicated more clearly thus exhibiting himself to be quite the loyal dream teamer. His failure to do this depicted him as a "dog kent" therefore concluding with the question, am I really what 'The F.A.R.K' refers to as a"tossbag" in this incident? Am I not acting out of reasonable judgement? You have a lot to think about but finally, "FLOWER OFF" THE F.A.R.K!! You're "a genuine White Goodman" who can't properly correspond with others because your shower English (no offence if you're an immigrant) and you cannot lay fault on someone else who could not identify what you implied because you are so hindered that your statements don't even make sense.Flowering flower bag

FARK did start Danger for round 1 and traded him out after he scored 51.

I'm guessing you don't know what he meant when he said "Euros"?

[powersuperkents]

Hhahahahaahahahaha

Im sorry everyone, I just read what I posted and saw how ridiculous all this was (especially the post I wrote). I got carried away with laughter thinking it was funny but in the end it is pretty pointless

p.s.
I'm still laughing at what I wrote now :)

But I still stand at the conclusion that either The F.A.R.K is a dog or an illiterate ;)

[stew42]

why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out

hahaha so fair

because I have faith. Karny and siposs still have potential im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)

Trading out Dangerfield is worse than Karny and Siposs. Karny and Siposs were in your team just to make cash... They did not... SO IT'S LOGICAL TO TRADE THEM OUT BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT DOING THEIR JOB, WHILST THERE WERE CHEAPER ROOKS WHO WERE MAKING THE DOUGH!!!!

Dangerfield you paid $525k for... He was a premium choice.... He was suppose to stay in your team for the remainder of the season.. If you traded a premium after one game your a flowering f8gg8t!!! You are the definition of "someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game", Your a dog kent. You could have picked JPK, Selwood, Murphy, Redden or Swallow... YOu chose Danger because you obviously thought irrationally that he would perform better... If you traded him out after his 2nd game I'd still think you are a f*g, If you traded him out after his 3rd I'd have respect... You traded him out after one game, where he had the flu and was heavily tagged, also the game wasn't dream team friendly... I call dog!!! What good is a dream teamer who doesn't even have faith in his own premium choices. I haven't traded one of my premium mids out because I'm not a re and got players who I knew would perform.

So I conclude out of the two of us, I'm the one with faith in my players!!!
Court Adjourned

Come on mate you seriously need to back off with the personal attacks. You don't know what people's strategies are or any other problems people have with their team that required them to use the two trades.

Round 1 Dangerfield gets 51 (and averages 80 over the first 3 rounds) and Siposs gets 80 as a fwd. I probably would have traded Danger out over Siposs as well. He copped a hard tag and couldn't handle it. Plus he has had one breakout year and can't be considered a true premium yet. And to say FARK should have gotten rid of Siposs and Karny earlier when you don't know what other trades he has done is unfair. I'd like three trades this week for Zorko, Kruezer and Varcoe but I don't have them.

A lot of what you post is correct mate but you really need to tone it down.

haha I'm sorry I haven't really had the chance to feel any empathy yet this season as the only trade I have been forced to composed so far have been discarding Zorko (easy trade to Stevie J) and Karny (also an easy trade to Dwyer). You guys are right I should of seen it through 'The F.A.R.K's' perspective before commenting I can't know what problems he could of had with his team. But I stand by my policy of trading premium midfielders. It is logically correct to trade out a premium mid who isn't performing but it is ethically and morally wrong in my opinion as they are the players you specifically have chosen over all others to carry your team, the backbone if you will

Really? Bro, do you even philosophise?

In Dream team I would consider picking your premium players philosophising. You take statistics, facts, variables, appeal, personal reference and most importantly faith into account when purchasing a player at $500k+. People who just throw in any premium without thought either has no dream team experience, doesn't care or is just an idiot. You pick a premium because they are the players who you think will be the top dogs come seasons end. I picked Cotchin over a much more proven Lids because I had faith he would be better. I picked Watson over Stants because I had faith he would be better (still do, the 65 was only one game out of twenty-two), I picked Pendles over Cotchin originally because I had faith he would be better and I found room to turn Redden into Cotchin because like the other decisions I didn't want to start without him because I had faith he would be better. Arguably I was right about every single decision (arguably referring to Watson>Stanton (Watson will still flower the showerhead up!). I didn't get side tracked by irrational decisions like JPK, Dangerfield, Scooter & Swallow and pick them on personal preference alone (I sometimes wish I got sidetracked by Swallow, but I would prefer everyone of my premium picks over in the midfield over Swallow 7 days a week) unlike most people and in most case (nearly all) they got flowered up by not thinking logically (Andrew Swallow can't be used to rebut because before this week only 7.11% of teams had him, now 9.19% do). Swallow by season's end won't beat Swan, GAJ, Pendles, Cotchin or Watson so I'm happy with it. But my conclusion is when you pick a midfield do it according to math and logic and a little bit of emotion and personal preference not a full blown rush of inclination. Most importantly it's a waste of time to make stupid ass decisions and then ask for help to a problem that easy. If there was a slight bit of logic you would just go Danger -> Proven Premium not bother other people for answer thus not learning anything from your mistake. It is acceptable to seek help for upgrades or downgrades in the midfield but if it's sideways trading flower off and use common sense too not make the same stupid emotionally based decisions (eg. people bringing in Kane Cornes etc. (I wouldn't even consider bringing in Swallow based on 3 rounds over a proven players like Stanton, Deledio etc an emotionally based decision (don't get me wrong he'll do well but he should be an upgrade target so you have more time to assess). Now after going through all that thought and process to selecting your midfield answer me, is it unethical to just throw them under the bus after one or two rounds because they didn't reach your unrealistic expectations? People picked these players for a reason so why not see if they can fulfill it instead of being grade A dog kents and sooking after one or two poor (realistic (Dangerfield got 51, 95 & 95 (an average game for him if you have a clear and logical mindset (he is a POD and that's why people picked him occasional scores of 50-70 are expected) performances and dumping them for someone who has had what could be nothing more than a good start to the season...         

Overall dumping your premium midfield players is the most notorious dog act in dream team

So you think people who work in the stock exchange are philosophers? They "take statistics, facts, variables, appeal, personal reference and most importantly faith into account when purchasing" their stocks. Although their faith (gut feeling is probably a better word) probably is not the most important thing they take into account.

Anyway, I never said philosophising. You think there is an ethical and moral side to a fantasy football game? This is a game guys, cool ya jets :)

[powersuperkents]

why would you have either of them?

Karny should have already been traded out

hahaha so fair

because I have faith. Karny and siposs still have potential im not someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game (except for Dangerfield)

Trading out Dangerfield is worse than Karny and Siposs. Karny and Siposs were in your team just to make cash... They did not... SO IT'S LOGICAL TO TRADE THEM OUT BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT DOING THEIR JOB, WHILST THERE WERE CHEAPER ROOKS WHO WERE MAKING THE DOUGH!!!!

Dangerfield you paid $525k for... He was a premium choice.... He was suppose to stay in your team for the remainder of the season.. If you traded a premium after one game your a flowering f8gg8t!!! You are the definition of "someone that will trade someone out after just 1 shower game", Your a dog kent. You could have picked JPK, Selwood, Murphy, Redden or Swallow... YOu chose Danger because you obviously thought irrationally that he would perform better... If you traded him out after his 2nd game I'd still think you are a f*g, If you traded him out after his 3rd I'd have respect... You traded him out after one game, where he had the flu and was heavily tagged, also the game wasn't dream team friendly... I call dog!!! What good is a dream teamer who doesn't even have faith in his own premium choices. I haven't traded one of my premium mids out because I'm not a re and got players who I knew would perform.

So I conclude out of the two of us, I'm the one with faith in my players!!!
Court Adjourned

Come on mate you seriously need to back off with the personal attacks. You don't know what people's strategies are or any other problems people have with their team that required them to use the two trades.

Round 1 Dangerfield gets 51 (and averages 80 over the first 3 rounds) and Siposs gets 80 as a fwd. I probably would have traded Danger out over Siposs as well. He copped a hard tag and couldn't handle it. Plus he has had one breakout year and can't be considered a true premium yet. And to say FARK should have gotten rid of Siposs and Karny earlier when you don't know what other trades he has done is unfair. I'd like three trades this week for Zorko, Kruezer and Varcoe but I don't have them.

A lot of what you post is correct mate but you really need to tone it down.

haha I'm sorry I haven't really had the chance to feel any empathy yet this season as the only trade I have been forced to composed so far have been discarding Zorko (easy trade to Stevie J) and Karny (also an easy trade to Dwyer). You guys are right I should of seen it through 'The F.A.R.K's' perspective before commenting I can't know what problems he could of had with his team. But I stand by my policy of trading premium midfielders. It is logically correct to trade out a premium mid who isn't performing but it is ethically and morally wrong in my opinion as they are the players you specifically have chosen over all others to carry your team, the backbone if you will

Really? Bro, do you even philosophise?

In Dream team I would consider picking your premium players philosophising. You take statistics, facts, variables, appeal, personal reference and most importantly faith into account when purchasing a player at $500k+. People who just throw in any premium without thought either has no dream team experience, doesn't care or is just an idiot. You pick a premium because they are the players who you think will be the top dogs come seasons end. I picked Cotchin over a much more proven Lids because I had faith he would be better. I picked Watson over Stants because I had faith he would be better (still do, the 65 was only one game out of twenty-two), I picked Pendles over Cotchin originally because I had faith he would be better and I found room to turn Redden into Cotchin because like the other decisions I didn't want to start without him because I had faith he would be better. Arguably I was right about every single decision (arguably referring to Watson>Stanton (Watson will still flower the showerhead up!). I didn't get side tracked by irrational decisions like JPK, Dangerfield, Scooter & Swallow and pick them on personal preference alone (I sometimes wish I got sidetracked by Swallow, but I would prefer everyone of my premium picks over in the midfield over Swallow 7 days a week) unlike most people and in most case (nearly all) they got flowered up by not thinking logically (Andrew Swallow can't be used to rebut because before this week only 7.11% of teams had him, now 9.19% do). Swallow by season's end won't beat Swan, GAJ, Pendles, Cotchin or Watson so I'm happy with it. But my conclusion is when you pick a midfield do it according to math and logic and a little bit of emotion and personal preference not a full blown rush of inclination. Most importantly it's a waste of time to make stupid ass decisions and then ask for help to a problem that easy. If there was a slight bit of logic you would just go Danger -> Proven Premium not bother other people for answer thus not learning anything from your mistake. It is acceptable to seek help for upgrades or downgrades in the midfield but if it's sideways trading flower off and use common sense too not make the same stupid emotionally based decisions (eg. people bringing in Kane Cornes etc. (I wouldn't even consider bringing in Swallow based on 3 rounds over a proven players like Stanton, Deledio etc an emotionally based decision (don't get me wrong he'll do well but he should be an upgrade target so you have more time to assess). Now after going through all that thought and process to selecting your midfield answer me, is it unethical to just throw them under the bus after one or two rounds because they didn't reach your unrealistic expectations? People picked these players for a reason so why not see if they can fulfill it instead of being grade A dog kents and sooking after one or two poor (realistic (Dangerfield got 51, 95 & 95 (an average game for him if you have a clear and logical mindset (he is a POD and that's why people picked him occasional scores of 50-70 are expected) performances and dumping them for someone who has had what could be nothing more than a good start to the season...         

Overall dumping your premium midfield players is the most notorious dog act in dream team

So you think people who work in the stock exchange are philosophers? They "take statistics, facts, variables, appeal, personal reference and most importantly faith into account when purchasing" their stocks. Although their faith (gut feeling is probably a better word) probably is not the most important thing they take into account.

Anyway, I never said philosophising. You think there is an ethical and moral side to a fantasy football game? This is a game guys, cool ya jets :)

haha I'm starting to change my views this year as well now, it seems like the game is now less about knowledge and more about cash this season (hence the new trading policy). This week started with my first stupid trade in a year. I went Westhoff > Franklin just because of that BE. I would never ever select him regardless of his first 3 scores if his BE wasn't so low. Might downgrade him to Cloke in two or three weeks if his BE stays low and then downgrade Cloke to Buddy or Stevie J and dump Goodes for Birchall. I think this season there is no excuse for anyone not to have a complete team by the end of the season. The 44 trades guarantee it :) If anyone doesn't end up completing their team regardless of injuries or lack of money they need to take a long look in the mirror. The new trading policy basically changes the way we play the game, but I'm still not going to trade any of my premium mids out, but that's because I have no reason to  ;)