possible mid trades.

[hugebbq]

thoughts on the following trades. Currently have Dangerfield, Whitfield and Lycett and am considering their place in my side.

which one would you do

1. Lycett > Neade and then Dangerfield > Watson
- will still have 50K in the bank

2. Lycett > Neade and then Whitfield > Viney (giving danger another chance possibly against raines!)
- net me 180k in da bank for double upgrade next week on danger and jjk if they don't perform

[Windigo]

I'd keep Danger, back him in!

Lycett>Rowe would be good if he is named maybe...

[hugebbq]

yeah leading more to keeping danger.

already have rowe on ruck bench so looking at neade. just thought Lycett was crap and js is dodgy with Sinclair pushing him.

Thoughts on whitfield. I know hes an outside player and struggled against Sydney but is viney a better option as it nets me near on 80K.

cheers

[Windigo]

I reckon it might be. I got roped into having an expensive rookie again in 2013 and TBH it just isn't worth the extra coin. Having Coniglio over the cheap rookies effectively ruined my season last year.  :P

[hugebbq]

grrr...I can see if I go whitfield > viney, hirdy will tag viney after that performance.

decisions, decisions

if they both score identically from here on, will whitfields extra 80k come into calcs for a quicker upgrade down the track?

[Ajax22]

Option 2, Vineys a bit of a must-have and Lycett's terrible.

I'd be more worried about Neeld doing something stupid with Viney than Hird looking to tag him...

[beachedaz]

grrr...I can see if I go whitfield > viney, hirdy will tag viney after that performance.

decisions, decisions

if they both score identically from here on, will whitfields extra 80k come into calcs for a quicker upgrade down the track?

If they both score identically, Whitfield won't stay $80k more expensive though. Viney will rise faster and they'll end up worth the same. I think Viney is a must have to be honest.