Is it worth having a player in your lineup that may not play round 1

[charliesheen]

Thinking of leaving one certain non starter for a captains loophole every week thoughts

Absolutely essential to do this IMO.

[SydneyRox]

Thinking of leaving one certain non starter for a captains loophole every week thoughts

Absolutely essential to do this IMO.

CS i respect your opinion, would like to hear some justification

[Ziplock]

continuous rolling lockout, pretty self explanatory :P

maybe chuck currie and daw on the ruck bench? one of them should be playing most games, but it's unlikely both will play at once.

[Pokerface]

The other reason not to do it - it will only work if your non-player plays late in the round. eg if you decided to keep crouch, you couldnt use him as a loophole because he is locked in after game 1.
They need to play late in the round every round.

[Ziplock]

haha

imagined if you loopholes cox with lets say currie, then currie was a late call up :P

[Spuds11]

Not really as risky as everyone thinks only really becomes an issue if your vice captain kicks ass