Riskyish vs Safeish. Please Help!

Started by Lecras2, March 15, 2013, 12:22:32 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Lecras2

Which team is better?

RISKY (ISH)

$10,500
DEF: GODDARD, GIBBS, HEPPEL, PITTARD, GOODES, STEVENSON (DOCHERTY, TERLICH)
MID: SWAN, ABLETT, PENDLEBURY, MURPHY, COTCHIN, MOLONEY, MITCHELL, OMEARA (VINEY, CROUCH0
RUC: COX, CURRIE (DAW, ROWE)
FWD: ROCKLIFFE, ROBINSON, WRIGHT, MARTIN, HARPER, KARNEZIS (MACAFFER, LEA)

SAFE (ISH)

$9,300
DEF: GODDARD, GIBBS, HEPPEL, PITTARD, GOODES, STEVENSON (DOCHERTY, TERLICH)
MID: SWAN, ABLETT, PENDLEBURY, BOYD, COTCHIN, WINES, MITCHELL, OMEARA (VINEY, CROUCH0
RUC: COX, CURRIE (DAW, ROWE)
FWD: ROCKLIFFE, ROBINSON, FRANKLIN, MARTIN, HARPER, KARNEZIS (MACAFFER, LEA)

Couple of questions as well if you have the time. Firstly are vlastuin and wines really important to have in the team? I can shuffle the team around to fit vlastuin in if so. Also i've heard wright was tagging during the nab cup (not too sure)? Any other criticism and advice on both teams would be great. Thanks guys.

teatowel

i see franklin as an upgrade target as his 200 really beefed up his average so i reckon he is over priced.
i'd go boyd, wines, zork.
get a bitta zor'knezliff in ya

Jukes

I'd prefer the team without Spudlett.



Murphy 102, Moloney 85, Wright 89
vs
Boyd 115, Wines 80, Franklin 97

Get Zorko over Buddy tho. Zorks will avg 101-103 while Buddy won't come close to cracking the ton.

MGK1

Overrating Wines there a bit Jukes?
I think around 70 is more realistic.