This or that? - Dane Swan vs Dayne Beams vs Scott Pendlebury

[Jukes]

Jukes Coefficients for each player;

Swan = 133 + 128 + -5 = 258
Beams = 116 + 122 + 6 = 244
Pendles = 110 + 118 + 8 = 236

Swan = 258
Beams = 244 + 17.22
Pendles = 236 + 23.18

Swan = 258
Beams = 261.22
Pendles = 259.18

Beams is the best rated player, Pendles second, Swan third. This is more accurate as each player has minimal injury history and all play for the same team, meaning no differential for byes/fixtures.

I was going to go with Beams and Pendles without the coefficient results; they just confirm my initial instincts.

[Toga]

good on ya jukes ;)

love your work!

[Toga]

I will be one of the only people next year to start with all 3 of Swan, Pendles and Beams next year and hopefully having the trio will be a good unique for me to get a decent start on everybody else :)

I've got all three locked as well at the moment... Confident all three will be inside the top 5 mids come season's end...

Who else is locking in all three of these Pies guns?

[stew42]

So far my gun mids are Swan, GAJ, Boyd, Pendles Murphy. That will do for now... although if I need a bit of cash, then Swan/GAJ to Beams is definitely an option.