Help me choose please

[GM]

He will be no 1 player on opposition sides thoughts now.
Imo they wiil man up on Judd at stopages and then attach themselves to Murphy elsewhere.

[Jalapeno]

Sweet..

Well how does this mid look then?

Swan, Boyd, Cotchin, Pendles, Stants, Fyfe, K Mitchell, Crouch (Omeara, Viney)

THoughts??

[Ricochet]

Murphy is sooo cheap but

Murphy won't go 107+, if very vulnerable to the heavy tag of Raines, Clint, Selwood etc and he will get that most weeks.

Stants > Redden > Murphy

I don't think he will be affected by tags.

He's been tagged before and still averaged 111 (disregarding last year because it was severely injury affected)
2011 RD 6 v Sydney: "tagged by Bird" = 119 points
2011 RD 7 v Saints: "tagged by Jones" = 98 points
2011 RD 11 v Port: "tagged by Cornes" = 117 points
2011 RD 16 v Bullies: "tagged by Picken" = 116 points
2011 RD 17 v Pies: "tagged by Wellingham" = 98 points
2011 RD 18 v Essendon: "tagged by Melksham" = 118 points
2011 RD 21 v Freo: "tagged by Mzungu" = 105 points

This was 2 years ago now, so thats two years of development both physically and mentally.
Even if he does score below 110 sometimes when tagged, he smashes every other team and makes up for it.

He is a gun and underpriced... you have to lock him in

[GM]

Looks good.(without Gazza)

[GM]

Murphy is sooo cheap but

Murphy won't go 107+, if very vulnerable to the heavy tag of Raines, Clint, Selwood etc and he will get that most weeks.

Stants > Redden > Murphy

I don't think he will be affected by tags.

He's been tagged before and still averaged 111 (disregarding last year because it was severely injury affected)
2011 RD 6 v Sydney: "tagged by Bird" = 119 points
2011 RD 7 v Saints: "tagged by Jones" = 98 points
2011 RD 11 v Port: "tagged by Cornes" = 117 points
2011 RD 16 v Bullies: "tagged by Picken" = 116 points
2011 RD 17 v Pies: "tagged by Wellingham" = 98 points
2011 RD 18 v Essendon: "tagged by Melksham" = 118 points
2011 RD 21 v Freo: "tagged by Mzungu" = 105 points

This was 2 years ago now, so thats two years of development both physically and mentally.
Even if he does score below 110 sometimes when tagged, he smashes every other team and makes up for it.

He is a gun and underpriced... you have to lock him in

You are right mate,i just will have to make a choice between Cotchin & Murphy myself.I can afford both.
I will get both in the end.I just think Cotchin will become the next G. Ablett and will start better.I really love the way he finds his own footy,which is hard to stop.

[Jalapeno]

Looks good.(without Gazza)

Haha i think swanny is a better option

[GM]

Looks good.(without Gazza)

Haha i think swanny is a better option

Both is the best.lol

[Jukes]

Looks good.(without Gazza)

Haha i think swanny is a better option

Swan will average 15 more than Ablett. GAJ is a spud for sheep who only look at stats.

[GM]

Looks good.(without Gazza)

Haha i think swanny is a better option

Swan will average 15 more than Ablett. GAJ is a spud for sheep who only look at stats.

Haha Jukesy, stats in DT don't matter? :o

[Jukes]

Looks good.(without Gazza)

Haha i think swanny is a better option

Swan will average 15 more than Ablett. GAJ is a spud for sheep who only look at stats.

Haha Jukesy, stats in DT don't matter? :o

stats only count if ceterus paribis. Look at his calf and back injury-plagued pre-season, the rise of young superstars like Swallow and Bennell, GC wanting to wean their dependance on Ablett off, etc.

[Adamant]

I reckon Stanton and even Redden's popularity has increased after them both being in Warnie's Pre-NAB Team on DTT.

[Jukes]

I reckon Stanton and even Redden's popularity has increased after them both being in Warnie's Pre-NAB Team on DTT.

He has Stants? What a lad and anti-lad.

Lad because has Stants <3
Anti-Lad because he's making my boy less unique.

[hardnut]

Stanton polarises opinion so will always struggle on these polls, will frustrate but will go huge a few times. I don't see massive increase in avg as likely but have had him before and enjoyed some BIG scores...