kreuzer and franklin vs sandi and walker

[starz]

i have a good feeling about kreuzer this year so im definately leaning towards him and franklin. im not sure who would be worse to start without franklin or sandi. i see kreuzer doing something similar to nic nat from last year but i just hope he doesn't have trouble scoring if there are too many ruckman in the team. i dont like his scoring potentil with hampson in the team.

[Hawko]

Kruze dog and Franklin for sure. Sandi won't play more than 15 and walker l don't rate high at all, ESP in sc scoring

[MTTY]

Decided on Sandilands and Walker. Risky combo eitherway but Sandi and Walker just seems and looks like they will combine to outscore/ out average Kruezer and Franklin. (I also think Franklin is slighty over priced).

[bottlemart]

Sandilands and Walker.

I was surprized by all the love fro Kreuzer last year, and i'm equally surprized by the love this year.

Kreuzer may prove me wrong by breaking out, but at this stage, you have a proven ruckman such as Sandi who has hit the ton more times than not, against a ruckman who has seldom hit the ton.

Re Buddy and Walker, I'm starting with walker, with a view to upgrade buddy later.  Just personal view, but with hawthorn playing the other 7 finalists first up, there is bound to be one or two teams that hold him to an average score, enough for perhaps a price reduction and a good entry level for the rest of the season.

[ubeaut]

There ARE too many ruckman in the team. Kruezer promises but never delivers. Warnock is a good ruck but crap forward,so if he plays its as a ruck. Hampson and kreuz do both. Too inconsistent. Go Sandilands.

Walker to start with Buddy's draw.

[Ricochet]

Has to be Sandi and Walker

[SydneyRox]

Has to be Sandi and Walker

No doubt. Sandi will destroy Kruezer head to head and Walker wont be that far behind buddy at the end of the year.