McIntosh or Jacobs?

[simm_bo]

Mcintosh at a new club, No.1 ruck, injury prone. Jacobs No. 1, not injury prone, consistent

[hardnut]

I had Jacobs last year, great player but not a true DT option as doesn't get it much around the ground and doesn't kick goals. Will be more of the same from Jacobs. H-Mac offers a little upside as can get a few touches and will rest forward with little attention as Hawk/Pods will take best defenders. The injury concern is reduced by 44 trades.

[essendon2]

I'd go McEvoy over both

[nrich102]

I'm not having either, but HMac over Jacobs.

The answer is GOLDSTEIN

[Adamant]

H-Mac for me.

H-Mac will average more, he'll be around the 90-95 mark, whereas it's hard to see Jacobs really improving on his 87 average.

Both solid options, but H-Mac has much more upside IMO.

[Adamant]

I'm not having either, but HMac over Jacobs.

The answer is SANDILANDS

Fixed.

[melon101]

McIntosh!

[nrich102]

I'm not having either, but HMac over Jacobs.

The answer is SANDILANDS

Fixed.

I guess, but Goldy is cheaper

[hardnut]

I'm not having either, but HMac over Jacobs.

The answer is SANDILANDS

+1

[Football Factory]

H.Mac

[Windigo]

H-mac for sure, is one of the best scoring rucks when fit.

Considered Mummy at a similiar price?

Plays Giants, Suns & Cats in his first 5. Teams that he dominates against.

[youl_R_FCK]

going goldy but hmac looms as possibly ave 100 this year. he will just get rested. for four games