2013 Player Profile: Marc Murphy

Started by elephants, September 09, 2012, 10:44:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jukes

Quote from: mezzoculo on January 30, 2013, 11:35:38 PM
Quote from: Jukes on January 30, 2013, 10:41:51 PM
He'll be easily tagged out of games by Jackson, Kelly and a Selwood, meaning those three games he probably won't hit the 100. The other two I can't see him busting out a big 115+ score.
Thanks Jukes!

I was thinking of starting a thread titled 'The Tambling Moments' to celebrate those big calls that are so glaringly wrong you regret them as soon as the words pass your lips.

This here is the early season bolter, otherwise known as 'The Stanton'. ;)

I think you'll find that the +1s by kb and ess2 that my statement is very valid and accurate.

I think you should nominate yourself then mate, for being such an outrageous spud.



Murphy will come out of the first 5 weeks with an average of about 95-100. Montagna will pump out a few 130s and hopefully a couple of 100s and his average will be about 115, meaning that going with my strategy you can gain 15 points per week and save some money while you're at it.

mezzoculo

Quote from: Jukes on January 31, 2013, 01:05:27 AM
Quote from: mezzoculo on January 30, 2013, 11:35:38 PM
Quote from: Jukes on January 30, 2013, 10:41:51 PM
He'll be easily tagged out of games by Jackson, Kelly and a Selwood, meaning those three games he probably won't hit the 100. The other two I can't see him busting out a big 115+ score.
Thanks Jukes!

I was thinking of starting a thread titled 'The Tambling Moments' to celebrate those big calls that are so glaringly wrong you regret them as soon as the words pass your lips.

This here is the early season bolter, otherwise known as 'The Stanton'. ;)

I think you'll find that the +1s by kb and ess2 that my statement is very valid and accurate.

I think you should nominate yourself then mate, for being such an outrageous spud.

Murphy will come out of the first 5 weeks with an average of about 95-100. Montagna will pump out a few 130s and hopefully a couple of 100s and his average will be about 115, meaning that going with my strategy you can gain 15 points per week and save some money while you're at it.
We will see, Jukes.

essendon2

Quote from: Jukes on January 31, 2013, 01:05:27 AM
Quote from: mezzoculo on January 30, 2013, 11:35:38 PM
Quote from: Jukes on January 30, 2013, 10:41:51 PM
He'll be easily tagged out of games by Jackson, Kelly and a Selwood, meaning those three games he probably won't hit the 100. The other two I can't see him busting out a big 115+ score.
Thanks Jukes!

I was thinking of starting a thread titled 'The Tambling Moments' to celebrate those big calls that are so glaringly wrong you regret them as soon as the words pass your lips.

This here is the early season bolter, otherwise known as 'The Stanton'. ;)

I think you'll find that the +1s by kb and ess2 that my statement is very valid and accurate.

I think you should nominate yourself then mate, for being such an outrageous spud.



Murphy will come out of the first 5 weeks with an average of about 95-100. Montagna will pump out a few 130s and hopefully a couple of 100s and his average will be about 115, meaning that going with my strategy you can gain 15 points per week and save some money while you're at it.
I agree that Murphy won't do as well as everyone expects...
but I'm very uncertain on montags, I think I'd rather ROK or Jack!

tbagrocks

I'll take that bet Jukes! Murphy to out score Montagna after round 5? You man enough to back your words?

I'll prove that the draw is irrevevant

mezzoculo

Averages against first six opponents (2011 - 2012)

Montagna:
GCS (3 games) - 99.6
RIC (2 games) - 84.0
GWS (1) - 128.0
ESS (2) - 90.5
SYD (3) - 88
COL (2*) - 115.5 (* excl. injured affected 51 in Rnd 11, 2011)

Overall Rnd 1 - 6 average (2011 - 2012) - 100.9

Murphy:
RIC (4 games) - 113.3
COL (3 games) - 100.3
GEE (1) - 121
WCE (1*) - 120 (* excl. 121 scored in SF, 2011)
ADE (1*) - 126 (* excl. injury affected 27 in Rnd 8, 2012)
MEL (2) - 116

Overall Rnd 1 - 6 average (2011 - 2012) - 116.1

Jukes

Quote from: tbagrocks on January 31, 2013, 01:20:30 AM
I'll take that bet Jukes! Murphy to out score Montagna after round 5? You man enough to back your words?

I'll prove that the draw is irrevevant

Done. What'll the winner take then? dp alterations?

Scrads

Quote from: Jukes on January 31, 2013, 01:40:14 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on January 31, 2013, 01:20:30 AM
I'll take that bet Jukes! Murphy to out score Montagna after round 5? You man enough to back your words?

I'll prove that the draw is irrevevant

Done. What'll the winner take then? dp alterations?

You won't seriously risk Boxxy will you ? :P

tbagrocks


Jukes

Quote from: Scrads on January 31, 2013, 01:46:36 AM
Quote from: Jukes on January 31, 2013, 01:40:14 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on January 31, 2013, 01:20:30 AM
I'll take that bet Jukes! Murphy to out score Montagna after round 5? You man enough to back your words?

I'll prove that the draw is irrevevant

Done. What'll the winner take then? dp alterations?

You won't seriously risk Boxxy will you ? :P

mate when half of your rotating wallpapers are of boxxy you can risk the chance of dropping your dp of her on a forum :P

Quote from: tbagrocks on January 31, 2013, 01:54:40 AM
Yeah i'll wear a box for a month :P

And what should I don? Tex?

I like Walker so wouldn't be too bad...

tbagrocks

Something less scary and possibly better, a MU for a Blue ;), The last thing I ever wanted

Jukes

Quote from: tbagrocks on January 31, 2013, 01:59:01 AM
Something less scary and possibly better, a MU for a Blue ;), The last thing I ever wanted

done...and I have exactly the right picture in mind.

Andrew

Quote from: Scrads on January 31, 2013, 01:46:36 AM
Quote from: Jukes on January 31, 2013, 01:40:14 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on January 31, 2013, 01:20:30 AM
I'll take that bet Jukes! Murphy to out score Montagna after round 5? You man enough to back your words?

I'll prove that the draw is irrevevant

Done. What'll the winner take then? dp alterations?

You won't seriously risk Boxxy will you ? :P


I'd be very disappointed..! Although I'm no more intelligent for finding out who that chick actually is, I don't care about that :P