Nic Nat DPP

[chaosAD]

Will he and Cox be DPP? They both swapped forward to ruck

[Adamant]

Unlikely, but I reckon Cox would have to be a chance (especially being named Forward Pocket in AA). Cant see NicNat getting DPP though.

[nostradamus]

Unlikley, but I reckon Cox would have to be a chance (especially being named Forward Pocket in AA). Cant see NicNat getting DPP though.

+1 .......Cox started fwd in most games, and spent alot less time in the ruck that Nic Nat

[Justin Bieber]

[Ricochet]

yeh i think Cox has more chance but would be amazing if both were

[AFEV]

yeh i think Cox has more chance but would be amazing if both were

You'd have to lock them both in if they were, you really wouldn't have much of a choice. Seems unlikely given they're looking to strip some MPPs to encourage unique picks. Or so I heard. :o

[Ricochet]

yeh i think Cox has more chance but would be amazing if both were

You'd have to lock them both in if they were, you really wouldn't have much of a choice. Seems unlikely given they're looking to strip some MPPs to encourage unique picks. Or so I heard. :o

really?? that would make it very interesting

[Master Q]

If you think about it most rucks end up playing some minutes up front so I guess they'd have to be named there to be MPP. I'd say Cox is more likely than Nic Nat though...

[c4v3m4n]

yeh i think Cox has more chance but would be amazing if both were

You'd have to lock them both in if they were, you really wouldn't have much of a choice. Seems unlikely given they're looking to strip some MPPs to encourage unique picks. Or so I heard. :o

I have heard exactly the same thing. All premium players wont be given MPPs to entire more unique teams, cause lets face it, if Cox or NicNat were F/R next year, EVERYONE would have them. Where is the fun in that? :-\

[Ziplock]

all premium? so is like goodes going to be pure F etc.?

fact is most players are dpp because they play in dual positions... they might change the criteria though, like to be dpp def/mid you have to play 70% defence rather than 50% or w.e it is.

[c4v3m4n]

all premium? so is like goodes going to be pure F etc.?

fact is most players are dpp because they play in dual positions... they might change the criteria though, like to be dpp def/mid you have to play 70% defence rather than 50% or w.e it is.

Goodes will be F anyway, has spent most of his time in the forward line.

[Ziplock]

yeah I know, he wasn't a great example...

someone like goddard is probs better :P