Smokies for 2013!!

Started by underdog11, December 29, 2012, 03:55:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Justin Bieber

Quote from: Adamant on January 21, 2013, 10:07:21 PM
Shane Tuck.

- Averaged 107 if you remove his sub affected 47 in round 1 (which he got in less than 2 quarters). His 107 average would place him 9th overall for averages in 2012.

- He has a massive ceiling with 5 x 130+ scores, and was still fairly consistent with 16 x 90+ scores too.

- He will also almost never be tagged with Cotch and Lids attracting all of the attention.

It's hard to really see him improving at his age, but if you're looking for a 105+ POD with a high ceiling, Tucky is your man.
Shane Tuck would of been the biggest smokie LAST year.

Adamant

Quote from: whatlez on January 21, 2013, 11:48:24 PM
Quote from: Adamant on January 21, 2013, 10:07:21 PM
Shane Tuck.

- Averaged 107 if you remove his sub affected 47 in round 1 (which he got in less than 2 quarters). His 107 average would place him 9th overall for averages in 2012.

- He has a massive ceiling with 5 x 130+ scores, and was still fairly consistent with 16 x 90+ scores too.

- He will also almost never be tagged with Cotch and Lids attracting all of the attention.

It's hard to really see him improving at his age, but if you're looking for a 105+ POD with a high ceiling, Tucky is your man.
Shane Tuck would of been the biggest smokie LAST year.

Yeah, he would have been the pick of the year IMO.

This year he isn't much of a smokie, but more of a POD.

Ziplock

I nearly grabbed him, but opted for mccarthy instead

Toga

Quote from: Adamant on January 21, 2013, 11:57:59 PM
Quote from: whatlez on January 21, 2013, 11:48:24 PM
Quote from: Adamant on January 21, 2013, 10:07:21 PM
Shane Tuck.

- Averaged 107 if you remove his sub affected 47 in round 1 (which he got in less than 2 quarters). His 107 average would place him 9th overall for averages in 2012.

- He has a massive ceiling with 5 x 130+ scores, and was still fairly consistent with 16 x 90+ scores too.

- He will also almost never be tagged with Cotch and Lids attracting all of the attention.

It's hard to really see him improving at his age, but if you're looking for a 105+ POD with a high ceiling, Tucky is your man.
Shane Tuck would of been the biggest smokie LAST year.

Yeah, he would have been the pick of the year IMO.

This year he isn't much of a smokie, but more of a POD.

Would've web tight between the Richmond boys in Maric and tucks eh? ;)

Adamant

Quote from: Toga on January 22, 2013, 02:20:24 AM
Quote from: Adamant on January 21, 2013, 11:57:59 PM
Quote from: whatlez on January 21, 2013, 11:48:24 PM
Quote from: Adamant on January 21, 2013, 10:07:21 PM
Shane Tuck.

- Averaged 107 if you remove his sub affected 47 in round 1 (which he got in less than 2 quarters). His 107 average would place him 9th overall for averages in 2012.

- He has a massive ceiling with 5 x 130+ scores, and was still fairly consistent with 16 x 90+ scores too.

- He will also almost never be tagged with Cotch and Lids attracting all of the attention.

It's hard to really see him improving at his age, but if you're looking for a 105+ POD with a high ceiling, Tucky is your man.
Shane Tuck would of been the biggest smokie LAST year.

Yeah, he would have been the pick of the year IMO.

This year he isn't much of a smokie, but more of a POD.

Would've web tight between the Richmond boys in Maric and tucks eh? ;)

Haha forgot about the Mullet.

Maric increased his average from 59 ---> 98 (39 ppg increase).

Tuck went 70 ---> 107 (37 ppg increase).

Maric wins... just.

owenbond007

Quote from: Adamant on January 22, 2013, 04:15:40 AM
Quote from: Toga on January 22, 2013, 02:20:24 AM
Quote from: Adamant on January 21, 2013, 11:57:59 PM
Quote from: whatlez on January 21, 2013, 11:48:24 PM
Quote from: Adamant on January 21, 2013, 10:07:21 PM
Shane Tuck.

- Averaged 107 if you remove his sub affected 47 in round 1 (which he got in less than 2 quarters). His 107 average would place him 9th overall for averages in 2012.

- He has a massive ceiling with 5 x 130+ scores, and was still fairly consistent with 16 x 90+ scores too.

- He will also almost never be tagged with Cotch and Lids attracting all of the attention.

It's hard to really see him improving at his age, but if you're looking for a 105+ POD with a high ceiling, Tucky is your man.
Shane Tuck would of been the biggest smokie LAST year.

Yeah, he would have been the pick of the year IMO.

This year he isn't much of a smokie, but more of a POD.

Would've web tight between the Richmond boys in Maric and tucks eh? ;)

Haha forgot about the Mullet.

Maric increased his average from 59 ---> 98 (39 ppg increase).

Tuck went 70 ---> 107 (37 ppg increase).

Maric wins... just.

LOL! I had em both. Neither from the start. Got Maric at 309k for mummy 452k. Then he went boom. And racked 96 124 102 124 122 116 96 113 122. Was easily the best mid-priced player of the season.

essendon2

Quote from: Adamant on January 21, 2013, 10:07:21 PM
Shane Tuck.

- Averaged 107 if you remove his sub affected 47 in round 1 (which he got in less than 2 quarters). His 107 average would place him 9th overall for averages in 2012.

- He has a massive ceiling with 5 x 130+ scores, and was still fairly consistent with 16 x 90+ scores too.

- He will also almost never be tagged with Cotch and Lids attracting all of the attention.

It's hard to really see him improving at his age, but if you're looking for a 105+ POD with a high ceiling, Tucky is your man.
+1 completely agree

essendon2

either Atley, Howard, Higgins or Harbrow

vitch

Quote from: essendon2 on January 31, 2013, 01:34:16 AM
either Atley, Howard, Higgins or Harbrow
don't mind Atley, reckon he is definately in the roos best 22, but an awkward price ($311,200) - as is my "smokie" Jared Polec. In his 3rd year @ Brissy and previously no luck with injury, this kid looks a classy mover, I may risk him but a mid @ $278,600 I guess he is just that. Anyone else considered him ???

Noz

#54
Ben Newton if named round 1.

Windigo

Steering clear of the smokies this year, the Golby experiment failed.  ::)

nrich102

Quote from: Windigo on February 03, 2013, 07:07:14 PM
Steering clear of the smokies this year, the Golby experiment failed.  ::)
+1