Coniglio vs Treloar

[tbagrocks]

Sounds like somebody is jealous that Western Sydney made a mistake ;D

[nrich102]

Don't take either

[Ziplock]

Sounds like somebody is jealous that Western Sydney made a mistake ;D

haha, taking coniglio over wingard? not likely.

coniglio averaged: 21.5 avg disposal at 68.6%, 2.6  tackles, 4.8 marks, 2.7  clearances

compared to

wingard averaged:  12.5 average disposals at 69.6%, 2.4 tackles, 1.9 marks, 1.5 clearances
wingard comes tops slightly in disposal efficiency, and is close in tackles... apart from that, he gets dominated in everything else. Coniglios and wingards vests about balance eachother out, considering that wingards lower stats means that despite having more vests, his low stats from those don't affect his average as much as coniglios one vested poor score does.

You can make a possible argument for wingard in that he might have spent more time forward rather than mid unlike coniglio, but you'd be wrong- wingard only averaged 0.5 goals per game, and clearly didn't spend enough time out of the mids to be given dpp.

point is, you can't under really any circumstances argue at this stage that choosing coniglio over wingard was a mistake...

[tbagrocks]

They had a few chances to take him, maybe not at 2, Port Adelaide are very grateful

Chad would have had similar numbers to other WS boys had he been selected by the Giants, silly comparison really. Let's look at all the great numbers the star young guns had at the Suns in their second season ... oh wait ???

It is more likely Chad to greatly increase than for the Giants to do much more, for this reason Chad would be a better pick for your fantasy team ;D

We all know the Giants needed their top picks to perform much more than Port need Chad in 2012, trying to compare start is useless. Expect greater things from Chad Wingard in 2013 is all i'm saying ;)

[kilbluff1985]

neither