Dempsey > Scotland, Lake > Suckling. Pull the trigger? I need counseling!

[Blues Blues Blues]

4 trades, $112k
Will finish top 2 guaranteed

Team IF I do the above trades:

DEF: Deledio, Goddard, H Shaw, Carrazzo, Enright, Scotland, Suckling (S Shaw, Bootsma)
MID: Ablett, Swan, Pendles, Watson, Jelwood, Thompson (Gibson, Couch)
RUCK: Maric, Mummy (Campbell, Orren)
FWD: Franklin, Sidebottom, Dangerfield, Chapman, Martin, Goodes, Zorko (Porps, Darling)

Leaves me 2 trades and $21k, and strong bench cover. All players named this week (except Buddy and Napolean Dynamite)

I could have traded Dempsey to Scotland last week with just 1 trade but held, now I can't afford! With Dempsey BE of 105 and Scotland 72, the gap will widen more.

Should I pull the trigger?!

[kfewster]

Dempse to scotland good move, but id b more inclined to use ur cash and upgrade mummy to a jacobs or nic nat.

[Blues Blues Blues]

Dempse to scotland good move, but id b more inclined to use ur cash and upgrade mummy to a jacobs or nic nat.

Yeah I have thought about upgrading Mummy, but I will need 2 trades to do it.

I could do Lake > Suckling, Mummy > Nicnat? Leaves me 2 trades and $37k. But still have stinky Dempsey to deal with. AND, Mummy could start to score well again?

[tbagrocks]

I'd rather take a risk and see what Mummy can do, Dempsey at footy park and then finals = problem

[Blues Blues Blues]

I'd rather take a risk and see what Mummy can do, Dempsey at footy park and then finals = problem

Yeah, I've held Mummy and his big sizeable arse all year on my bench, I may as well keep holding and see if he repays my undying faith.

Dempsey > Suckling, Lake > Scotland OR Waters OR who??? Which premo you think? I'm worried Waters will get reported this week in Derby, but I know Scotland has court case coming up and Carlton have more midfielders coming back in...

[tbagrocks]

probably Scotland, however Suckers looks alright just worried he's more suited to DT, but last week was promising! thing with Suckers is he could pull a 30 :P

[devize]

probably Scotland, however Suckers looks alright just worried he's more suited to DT, but last week was promising! thing with Suckers is he could pull a 30 :P

How is someone with a left foot like Suckling's more suited to DT? One of the best kicks in the game and SC loves a good kick.

Anyway, I'd go ahead with the trades. Leaves you with a good backline and two trades which is probably more than most at this stage. Mumford could turn out to be a good POD and if not, you've got 2 trades to use to upgrade him.

[tbagrocks]

probably Scotland, however Suckers looks alright just worried he's more suited to DT, but last week was promising! thing with Suckers is he could pull a 30 :P

How is someone with a left foot like Suckling's more suited to DT? One of the best kicks in the game and SC loves a good kick.

Anyway, I'd go ahead with the trades. Leaves you with a good backline and two trades which is probably more than most at this stage. Mumford could turn out to be a good POD and if not, you've got 2 trades to use to upgrade him.

probably because he's averaging more in DT! 87.2 v 86.8

[The Bomber]

probably Scotland, however Suckers looks alright just worried he's more suited to DT, but last week was promising! thing with Suckers is he could pull a 30 :P

How is someone with a left foot like Suckling's more suited to DT? One of the best kicks in the game and SC loves a good kick.

Anyway, I'd go ahead with the trades. Leaves you with a good backline and two trades which is probably more than most at this stage. Mumford could turn out to be a good POD and if not, you've got 2 trades to use to upgrade him.

probably because he's averaging more in DT! 87.2 v 86.8

Only this year because of a month of bad form. By the end of the season I wouldn't be surprised if his SC is greater than his DT...