Suckling OR MJ?

[Adamant]

3 Trades & 118k in the bank.
I can either do Darley > Suckling or Clarke > M.Johnson.
leaning towards Darley > Suckling so I can keep Marty as bench cover...


Suckling - 2012
Average: 87
90+ Scores: 7
Sub-80 Scores: 6
Scoring Range: 31-127
Upcoming Opponents: Geelong, Port, GCS, Sydney, West Coast

Johnson - 2012
Average: 86
90+ Scores: 10
Sub-80 Scores: 5
Scoring Range: 42-113
Upcoming Opponents: West Coast, Adelaide, Richmond, North Melbourne & Melbourne.


Team Is:

DEF: Deledio, Scotland, Goddard, Birchall, Carrazzo, Heppell, CLARKE (DARLEY, S.Shaw)

MID: Swan, Ablett, Pendlebury, Boyd, Jelwood, Rockliff (Gibson, D.Smith)

RUC: Cox, McEvoy (Redden, Campbell)

FWD: Beams, Sidebottom, Franklin, Robinson, Dangerfield, Martin, Zorko (Treloar, Hall)

Thanks  :)

[Ajax22]

Would take Suckling over MJ even if they were the same price

[HBTD22]

Suckers for me!

[Windigo]

Suckling pretty solid. But he'll scare you with his first QTR's sometimes.  :P

Picking MJ just seems dodgy.  ::)

[Marcos83]

I would go fischer honestly. Suckling to up down for me.

[m1tch robo]

I am thinking of bringing in suckling too this week, I'm scared he will get rested against port or GC though in the next two weeks, what are peoples thoughts on this?

[Spinking]

Suckling for sure. MJ has had a great season, but does fluctuate depending on whatever his role is.

[Barra17]

Can I just say, how about Grimes? Has been killing it recently.

[Ajax22]

Can I just say, how about Grimes? Has been killing it recently.

HEAPS more expensive and even at a similar price would comfortably take Suckling over him

[Adamant]

I just did a little more research...


Suckling's scores against his upcoming opponents earlier in the season were:

Geelong: 71
Port: 70
GCS: N/A
Sydney: 75
West Coast: 93

Average = 77


Compared to Johnson:

West Coast: 96
Adelaide: 92
Richmond: 105
North: N/A
Melbourne: 51

Average = 86


Now im not so sure  :o