change the plans, or stick with it?

[Bill Manspeaker]

Deledio, Goddard, H.Shaw, Birchall, Hargrave, S.Shaw, Darley   (Spurr, Ellis)

Ablett, Pendlebury, S.Thompson, Selwood, Dal Santo, Horsley   (McDonald, Gibson)

Naitanui, Giles   (Redden, Stephenson)

Franklin, Sidebottom, Beams, Dangerfield, Martin, B.Harvey, Zorko   (Cameron, Couch)

9 trades and 367,100 remaining



okay so i honestly thought i had my plans set in stone, but i've been thinking about a slight change to the plan..

my initial plans were Hargrave -> Scotland, Ellis -> Carrazzo, but Waters is so tempting... and i'm not sure how the court case will affect Scotland (if at all)


so my question is should i just say stuff the court case and pick up Scotland anyway? or do i change and go with Waters?

also if i pick Scotland, should i wait till next week for Carrazzo? if i trade Carrots in this week, i'll only save $18,300.. if i wait till next week that MIGHT go up to about 50k? only just over 30k but would it be worth it? i reckon i'll be able to get the win this week without Carrazzo, but it is risky..

any thoughts are appreciated as always fellas :)

cheers



P.S: i know this question is mostly about players, but i wasn't sure about posting my whole team in the Players & Trades section.

[Ringo]

I would stick with Scotland and wait for Carrotts next week . Ellis has an achievable b/e so he will also increase in price for the trade.

[Bill Manspeaker]

thanks mate

yeah i reckon i'm gonna stick with Scotland.. i'd be kicking myself i changed my mind and it came back to bite me on the ass.

also after having a real hard look at my opponent, i think i'll be able to beat him without Carrazzo.. may aswell make some more cash and pick him up next week.

thanks again mate :)