Goodes to Adams, Magner to Murphy Too Risky?

Started by Karmaboy, May 08, 2012, 07:51:30 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Karmaboy

Is Goodes to Adams, Magner to Murphy Too Risky? It will leave me with 120k left.
Or should i trade Goodes for Sidey, and keep Magner until he reaches his fattening potential?

tor01doc

Seems several people are dropping Magner already.

Doesn't make a lot of sense given the high number of trades being use to cover unexpected problems.

Murphy is a must at some stage.

Goodes probably needs to go.

The best thing is that you get to reverse as many times as you like.

Ringo

Are you able to switch Goodes to mids and upgrade to Murphy.

Then Kennedy or other fattened cow to Horsley/Adams.

bottlemart

Quote from: Karmaboy on May 08, 2012, 07:51:30 PM
Is Goodes to Adams, Magner to Murphy Too Risky? It will leave me with 120k left.
Or should i trade Goodes for Sidey, and keep Magner until he reaches his fattening potential?
Goodes to Adams is good.

Magner to Murphy is good for this week, but if you wait until next week, you will probably get an extra $20k on Magner and Murph has a high BE so you may get a further discount on Murphy.  If trading to win you would do the trade this week, or if trading for the long term, the trade next week.

All in all I think bot are good trades.

Magner is a tough one.  He stil has maybe $60k to make, according to SC Gold, so ideally you would like to hold to get ful value.  Personally I want Horsely and adams in the week, so 2 rookies have to go.

I have decided to keep shiel, and cameron and smith are both coming off big scores, so they will both have good price rises over the next 2 week.  That leaves me with Magner, Ledger and Smedts, and 2 of that group must make way.  Still undecided.