Defender choice

[Stocutz]

Backs: god lids shaw waters hargraves (Ellis bugg)

Have enough cash to do either. I like Clarke but is he worth the extra 40k on a rookie?

The real qn here I guess is broughts or duffield? 65k saving on duffield, whom I've had in my side since the beginning. Just really wanna know is broughts worth the extra money??

[mezzoculo]

Duffield or Broughton? This is the $64,000 question.  :-\

I've got Duff and Clarke as I see better value for money in them both..

[GoLions]

i would go duffield and clarke as imo it isnt a good idea to have lids, ellis, and morris all in your backline

[Stocutz]

i would go duffield and clarke as imo it isnt a good idea to have lids, ellis, and morris all in your backline

Yeah but there really in as cows. Bugg will play as def 7 probably.
If not Morris I could go smeldts

[Jroo]

i would go duffield and clarke as imo it isnt a good idea to have lids, ellis, and morris all in your backline

+1 Too many Tigers and with them having a tough draw, i would not want to have 3 of them in one line.

[Stocutz]

Ok then I guess it's
Broughton V duffield with a 64k diff

[picker_man]

i would go duffield and clarke as imo it isnt a good idea to have lids, ellis, and morris all in your backline

+1 Too many Tigers and with them having a tough draw, i would not want to have 3 of them in one line.

i have 3 tigers in the backline not all on the field but id prefer them to have a tough draw as defenders then an easy one :P

[Alka]

i would go duffield and clarke as imo it isnt a good idea to have lids, ellis, and morris all in your backline

+1 Too many Tigers and with them having a tough draw, i would not want to have 3 of them in one line.

Yeah maybe if there were other decent back rookies this would be a valid statement. Nothing wrong with it, as long as you've got rid of them by their bye.