Aiming for top 1000

Started by Bronco, March 27, 2012, 09:38:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Bronco

Hey all,

Finished in the top 1200 last year, looking at cracking the top 1000 this year.

After changing my team a million times I think I'm settled on a team, baring team selections.

B: Goddard, Deledio, Broughton, Malceski, Lake, Bugg, Ellis (Mohr, Morris)
M: Pendlebury, Ablett (C), Dal Santo, Selwood, Magner, McDonald (Shiel, Pfeiffer)
R: Mumford, Giles (Redden, Stephenson)
F: Franklin, Fyfe, Chapman, Martin, Dangerfield, Kennedy, Smith (Dickson, Hall)

Morris, Pfeiffer, Dickson & Halls spots are still up for grabs but think I'm settled on the rest, mostly Guns & rookies strategy with the risk that maleceski & lake will go back to premium levels.

Let me know what you think.

Cheers!

twinkle

looks really good imo. seems like you had an extra 500K!

tor01doc

12 premiums is just enough.

Malceski 83? Is this enough for a D4? 1 game only I know but against GWS and it was not a massacre so he saw the ball.

I wonder about your forwards being too strong compared to your backs.

? Danger to Porps
? Lake to Adcock
Change NDS as well as he is very expensive to start with - same goes for Pendles.

Too many options.

Good luck.

SAMCRO

Quote from: tor01doc on March 27, 2012, 10:13:38 PM
Change NDS as well as he is very expensive to start with - same goes for Pendles.


Agree with NDS, he tends to have a few games each year where he doesn't score that well which results in a price drop.

troy87

This team is very similar to mine. Locked in 12 premiums but there is a potential for 15 if malceski and lake and dangerfield have good years.

I wouldnt change much and you have to take some risks in order to be different.

If you look back to the years when Malceski is fit he averages in the 90's and I thought 83 was a good start despite it being against GWS.