Cox vs Mumford

[Lecras2]

Is Cox too expensive? If you voted Mumford which out of Coniglio/Porplyzia to go with him.

[Holz]

go cox if your not going to use the money, you dont get interest in the bank

[Lecras2]

Well the poll has helped

[lukemattar]

im trying to decide the same thing! and the poll hasnt helped at all!!! hahaha. if i do get mummy over cox though im considering upgrading one of my mid rooks to coniglio as i feel he is one in the gws lineup who has good js.

[Lecras2]

Exactly the same idea, especially with clifton out now. It is either that or porplyzia which will be dodgy

[Chopps]

its a tricky one, will Cox average 105 + again vs mumford who for me is likely to lift his average but hasnt played a full season before.

i am going cox and if mumford looks the goods i ll bring him as 2nd ruck

[Ricochet]

i've gone with Cox. he's a DT gun and is worth every extra dollar

[Justin Bieber]

Go Cox. Number 1 ruckman this year.

[Virgil]

go cox if your not going to use the money, you dont get interest in the bank

You do, actually.  The value of money in the bank goes up as the 'magic number' decreases.