Cox V Mummy

[brownmans muffins]

I have both at the moment as my starting ruckmen

same deal, set and forget, rather have cox than risking some rookie ie stephenson who will struggle to get games or produce the odd 40

same

[GlassHarmonium]

i would not be worrying about Cox's preseason. Come round 1 when he scores 120+ all you people who do not select him will be wondering why not

[coolfugitiv0]

Get both ;)
They'll both be top 3 scoring rucks this year (barring injury).

[MontyJnr]

I'm a big supporter of the 1-3 setup, like I said on the strategy board..

I find the rucks the easiest place to pick rookies at the moment, with 3 options in giles, redden and orren looking like they have decent job security. I don't really have that kind of confidence in many of my other rookies in other spots around the ground, particularly forwards.
If you're taking the guns n rookies approach, you can only fit 13-14 premiums in your side at best. I think putting 2 of those premiums in the rucks is wasted when the other areas of your field probably need the premiums more, where rookies don't run as deep.

[TheMailman]

If you can do something useful with the cash created with Mumford then pick him, if not pick Cox.