Cox V Mumford

Started by NMFC8, March 17, 2012, 11:17:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Which Ruckman

Cox
5 (33.3%)
Mumford
10 (66.7%)

Total Members Voted: 1

NMFC8

need 1 of the above to partner giles

Justin Bieber

Cox vs Mumford plus dough. I'm exactly the same here, no clue

Rommas

I've had Mumford since day one backed up by Giles so I never really had enough coin to get Coxy, if I had the money I would trade Cox in in a heart beat, don't be too disheartened by tonights game, half the Eagles players were barely trying

NMFC8

I think cox is going to rest foward alot with Nic Nat
Mumford isn't really competing with anyone
so not sure

Holz

if you can use the cash to lift elsewhere go mummy if not cox, i dont think its that a big deal actually both good picks. Going cox will probably get you off to abit of a lead in the overall but mummy is better value so you should come home stronger for the finals. If i was going league i would go mummy and upgrade to cox, but i go for overall. Im still going mummy as i can use the 80k.

Justin Bieber

Quote from: Holzman on March 17, 2012, 11:22:53 PM
if you can use the cash to lift elsewhere go mummy if not cox, i dont think its that a big deal actually both good picks. Going cox will probably get you off to abit of a lead in the overall but mummy is better value so you should come home stronger for the finals. If i was going league i would go mummy and upgrade to cox, but i go for overall. Im still going mummy as i can use the 80k.
Same as here.

NMFC8

should i go Cox>Mumford & Waters>476k Defender

Jukes

Will average about the same, but Mummy is 80k cheaper. Know who I'm locking.

Holz

Quote from: NMFC8 on March 17, 2012, 11:28:04 PM
should i go Cox>Mumford & Waters>476k Defender

this thing with this is i think waters will do the same as a 480k defender (unless its shaw, goddard or lids)

Mummy and Waters would be my choice and upgrade elsewhere if you cant do that Cox and waters