Which Option?

[Adamant]

Which Option do you prefer? here is my team to have a better idea...

DEF: Goddard, Shaw, Birchall, Duffield, Hargrave, Clarke, Ellis (Smedts, Darley)

MID: Swan, Ablett, Jelwood, Sloane, Shiel, C.Smith (Magner, Gibson)

RUC: Cox, McEvoy (Giles, Redden)

FWD: Franklin, Goodes, Martin, Sidebottom, Dangerfield, Cameron, D.Smith (Kerridge, Couch)

47k Left.

Cheers

[Justin Bieber]

Your team looks fine at the moment. Maybe trade McEvoy to Orren and then Duffield to Prem and Kerridge to Porps?

[Capper]

Leave it, all good as far as i am concerned

[Zombie2.5]

If you go premo ruck to rookie you can make two upgrades?

[Jukes]

I'd say Cox and Mummy will average about the same, then a super premo will average a fair bit more then Sloane.

[Justin Bieber]

I'd say Cox and Mummy will average about the same, then a super premo will average a fair bit more then Sloane.

Unlikely. Cox will outs core by 5-10 ppg

[mezzoculo]

Option 3 for me. Although Danger has the higher potential output (as he did this time last year and the year before that) I trust Porps to punch out consistent 70s and increase in price nicely.

[owenbond007]

I'd say Cox and Mummy will average about the same, then a super premo will average a fair bit more then Sloane.

Unlikely. Cox will outs core by 5-10 ppg

There was a good article on DT Talk about rucks.Id say he would likely average easily 15+ on mummy. You get what you pay for when it comes to the big cox.

Like the choice of mcevoy as 2nd ruck good chance he will continue to grow his output. If you really want a uprade you could downgrade sloane to mccarthy who has massive upside and excellent preseason (as has sloane). That will give you enough cash to get that extra premo (or porp for a rookie (hint get rid of cameron)).

http://dreamteamtalk.com/2012/03/14/totally-rucked/