M4 and F5 combo

Started by felsty, March 14, 2012, 08:33:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Which duo will score better or be a better investment?

Dangerfield and Mid Rookie
10 (58.8%)
Porplyzia and Masten/McCarthy
7 (41.2%)

Total Members Voted: 2

felsty

Just wondering which combo would be better in my team. Have 3 premium mids (Ablett, Boyd, Selwood) and 4 prem forwards (Franklin, Fyfe, Pavlich, Martin)

dmac07

Porps and McCarthy, think porps, IF he stays healthy can score nearly as much as Dangerfield, and like Mccarthy as a pick this year, will play a big role probably on the wing at port

no eye deer

#2
I've got the same problem with Porps/ Danger and my back line. (see back/ forward combo poll/ post, not much feedback so far!) Sorry mate, I didn't vote because I'm really not sure myself! I'm leaning towards Porps/ midpricer, but Danger looks so good at the moment. Who are you thinking about for a mid priced mid? I like the look of Gaff.

felsty

prob not gaff.. liking the look of masten but im wary about his role in the team once shuey and priddis and the like come back. saturday night will be interesting and might give me the answer tbh.. ill be keeping a close eye on danger and porps too..
my thoughts were that porps would score just as well as danger, he has had a bit of time off and looking a bit thinner with a bit of a run up the ground.. could smash out some points, less of a risk with danger as well..
another reason for not getting danger in because someone with that price i would prob be wanting to keep! porps being less $ is less of a risk but will also make me more money in the long run.. i think with my structure (3-3mids) im wanting to get a few mid price options in at d5, m4, f5 to pick up the slack and keep strong scores coming against guys with 4 super premiums in their mids