Big O or Giles as 4th ruck

Started by Crows84, March 11, 2012, 01:39:01 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Crows84

So far have to Ryder and Hmac plus rowe from carlton on on the bench, just need to seperate giles and big o now

JKraz


Jukes

I would never have Rowe in with Giles and Redden dominating.

PowerBug

Ryder and Hmac?? Very interesting. Then go Redden and Giles.

Crows84

thanks, willing to take risks in the rucks as in makes my mid/fwds boom

Justin Bieber

Why don't you start Giles/big o. Might score similar to those two

Crows84

Quote from: whatlez on March 11, 2012, 02:52:04 PM
Why don't you start Giles/big o. Might score similar to those two


my rucks are not locked yet, and i have a stack of cash left, Realisitcally i will end up with just ryder or hmac and swap the other back to a prem r11 ruck. Rowe i am toying with as an idea come bye rounds though i may just trade him in if his cheap come that time. For ages i had big and giles on my bench but as others have said there has been a few other cheap options arise and since i wasnt overlly impressed with either of these two rookies, im thinking about keeping just one, thats why im trying to get others opinions

Justin Bieber

Quote from: Crows84 on March 11, 2012, 05:54:39 PM
Quote from: whatlez on March 11, 2012, 02:52:04 PM
Why don't you start Giles/big o. Might score similar to those two


my rucks are not locked yet, and i have a stack of cash left, Realisitcally i will end up with just ryder or hmac and swap the other back to a prem r11 ruck. Rowe i am toying with as an idea come bye rounds though i may just trade him in if his cheap come that time. For ages i had big and giles on my bench but as others have said there has been a few other cheap options arise and since i wasnt overlly impressed with either of these two rookies, im thinking about keeping just one, thats why im trying to get others opinions

Yeah what I said was silly, but Hmac/ Kruzer is too risky since there both like number 2 rucks at the club.