latest effort, 1-3 rucks and risky D5, or 1-1/2-2 rucks and thinner backs?

[fever]

2.4k left

b: godd, shaw, birchall, broughton, malceski, b smith, ellis (bugg, morris)

m: swan, murphy, selwood, caddy, hogan, magner (kerridge, jmac)

r: mummy, giles (redden, orren)

f: franklin, goodes, pav, rioli, danger, porps, pfieffer (saad, couch)


i could swap eski for a rookie and orren for hmac. thoughts on that or anything else?

[felsty]

get h.mac! i wanna boink the bloke.. guy is a gun. plus giles isnt good enough to start on the ground
in saying that you could downgrade porps and upgrade malceski, then downgrade caddy and hogan cos all they will be are cash cows at best, a position that any rookie can do! then upgrade to hmac :)

[fever]

some cash cows are better than others, no?

[tor01doc]

feisty felsty is right - he wants to boink HMc.

I'd up the rucks. Safer even if HMc doesn't really go bang. He'll still outscore most if not all rookies.

Caddy had better be pretty special at his price.

Porps and Danger could be problematic. Both come with a degree of risk.

Good overall.