mumford?

[lordy9]

will mummy be the only ruck in there team because if he is i might pick him  ???

[Justin Bieber]

I'm going Leuy at the moment, but I'm concerned on his scoring ability with big bodies around him.

[Windigo]

I'm going with Mumford.

Seaby is only a very good back up to him.  :P

[chaosAD]

Risky both

[TheMailman]

Really Mumford isn't that big a risk and neither is Leunberger.

Idk about Hudson, he isn't that flash

I do know that Seaby won't get games unless Mumford is <85%

No real injury risk in either. Mumford has a couple of niggles occasionally but really, so did Goldstein, Cox and Sandilands last year.

Maybe Longer and Hudson could push a little bit of potential TOG from Leunberger? that I couldn't say. If they do it probably won't be that significant though

Both are very good, not risky choices  :)

[Justin Bieber]

I'm only one who voted Leuy and I have converted haha.

[Grannyboy]

Mummy is a better sc'er than dt'er but having said that he takes lots of strong pack marks know where the goals are and can win hit out after hit out. He's got what it takes to be one of the top 2 rucks and the burger still has a few years to go I reckon.

[fertalong]

Mummy, but only because Luey has r11 bye with Giles.