sidebottom vs dangerfield

[eagles_h]

who is better. danger or sidebottom

[4INAROW]

both around the same potential and skill level but i think sidearse will get more of a run in the mids this year and be able to reach that potential, where as i dont think mousey will, i maybe wrong just follow both in nab cup, i can't split them for talent though.

[JamSainter]

Ha! I have both because 1 is bound to have a massive year - but I reckon both will.

[Mozza3]

Dangerfield has less competition for a spot in the mids and apparently he's been training with the mids.

[SIXX66]

Dangerfield has less competition for a spot in the mids and apparently he's been training with the mids.

2010 & 2011 just called....

they want their preseason info back

[sid3bysid3]

Haha sixx66 love it - I've been tempted every year yet he never delivers. Only thing is new couch, guess we'll have to wait and see.

Sidebum will likely hit the hundred. Kicks goals, get little pressure with his mates coppin it and uses the pill well oth sides

[Mozza3]

Dangerfield has less competition for a spot in the mids and apparently he's been training with the mids.

2010 & 2011 just called....

they want their preseason info back

I think Neil Craig took it.

[fever]

sidebottom has a lot more points going to teammates.

danger for me, i'm caught up in the hype this year!

[The Bomber]

almost caught in the same hype last year with dangerfield...dont think too much has changed...going with sidebottom cause even if he doesnt get that much time in the mid, the pill will come to forward line a fair bit more than it will for adelaide this year if dangerfield plays there...

if dangerfield shows signs of improvement he will be next years D. Martin