Having roo & Brown in the same side??

[TheBestThereIs]

Is it too risky to have both jono brown & Nick riewoldt in your sc side? what do you think?

[reesbr]

Not at all. Good risk

[Doyle]

In, short yes.

Brown's back from injury, so he's unproven and Nick has had a pretty average year, they could both fail or both rise superbly, but I'm only going to have one of them

[TheBestThereIs]

Ill pose another question...

Zaharakis & Cotchin or Riewoldt & Watson?

[ando_10]

In, short yes.

Brown's back from injury, so he's unproven and Nick has had a pretty average year, they could both fail or both rise superbly, but I'm only going to have one of them

im unsure why people are still crucifying riewoldt after 1 bad year hes still a freak and could be worthy in anyside.
and as for brown they werent even injuries just two freak fascial injuries so to answer your question no its not a bad risk.

[Ziplock]

riewoldt and cotchin :P

[upthemaidens]

brown is back from injury? what having his face caved in,, hardly gunna effect him(not like a hammy or something)
roo had a bad year last year true,,BUT he still averaged 87,, not bloody bad for a BAD year.  he has been a premium forward year in year out until then..  roo is a better choice than brown,but both are good value picks...SC not DT

[Presto]

brown is back from injury? what having his face caved in,, hardly gunna effect him(not like a hammy or something)
roo had a bad year last year true,,BUT he still averaged 87,, not bloody bad for a BAD year.  he has been a premium forward year in year out until then..  roo is a better choice than brown,but both are good value picks...SC not DT

+1

[Turkies]

brown is back from injury? what having his face caved in,, hardly gunna effect him(not like a hammy or something)
roo had a bad year last year true,,BUT he still averaged 87,, not bloody bad for a BAD year.  he has been a premium forward year in year out until then..  roo is a better choice than brown,but both are good value picks...SC not DT

well said

roo more potential for higher scores, brown is better value

[SonsOfZeus]

saints have a very favourable draw(hell yeah) abd dont with only hawthorn for good fwds. brisbane dont have any real bad clashes. nroo has had his knee fixed and last year as captain. im starting to think this is a good idea actually.

[yorgis]

they are both superstars of the game and both fit as ever. one injury does'nt make them has beens. avoid them at your peril

[Doyle]

In, short yes.

Brown's back from injury, so he's unproven and Nick has had a pretty average year, they could both fail or both rise superbly, but I'm only going to have one of them

im unsure why people are still crucifying riewoldt after 1 bad year hes still a freak and could be worthy in anyside.
and as for brown they werent even injuries just two freak fascial injuries so to answer your question no its not a bad risk.

Jonathan Brown has only even had 3 full seasons in his career and Nick Riewoldt has dropped his avg drastically since the surgery in 2010. 2009 avg- 106, 2010 avg- 94, 2011 avg- 84

[Ringo]

Prior to 2007 Browns seasons were effected more by suspensions rather than injury. From 2007 - 2010 he only missed a total of 7 games.  With the forced lay off last year due to the facial injuries his body would also have recovered from niggles. Both Brown and Riewoldt's stle of play suits supercoach scoring contested marks, marks on lead and goal so both in same side is not a huge risk. Only concern I have is both can off days with kicking.

[Footyrulz]

yeah i reckon and theyre bot that cheap either for a bargain.

[yorgis]

with you ringo !!