hard question please help

[coconut52]

Pendles is obviously a proven sc performer but i think sloane and bundi good be of a good value

[Purple 77]

Agree Christensen (especially) and Sloane represent good value, but depending on which forward rookie you get, Pendles and rookie will score more I think

[coconut52]

thanks for your help purple

[Goddard_18]

Depending on the rookie you get pendles and the rookie should get you more

[MC]

Sloane and Christensen combine to average say 160-170? If pendles gets 120 by himself then you don't need the rookie to do much hey?

[coconut52]

160-170 i think you sold them short a bit sloane averaged just under 90 last year and his more than like to improve and christen averaged 91 in the 2nd half of last season.. but pendles will probably average around 120

[MC]

Fair enough but can't see both raising their averages by too much just yet. Even at 90 each (which might be pushing it) rookie still only needs 60ppg which imo is more likely, especially some of the dpp mid fwds rolling around. At the end of the day though it's your choice.

[Mozza3]

Pendles will average 120 at worst but i think he'll be closer to the 130 mark again. Sloane is a good prospect and will push 100 and Christensen will be somewhere around the 90 mark I'd say.

[CrowsFan]

As much as I love Sloane (second favourite player), Pendles and a rookie would be the better choice ;)

[MajorLazer]

As much as I love Sloane (second favourite player), Pendles and a rookie would be the better choice ;)

I agree with CF, but I would choose Sloane and Christensen purely because of the greater risk associated.

[coconut52]

As much as I love Sloane (second favourite player), Pendles and a rookie would be the better choice ;)

I agree with CF, but I would choose Sloane and Christensen purely because of the greater risk associated.

yer gotta love a risk haha :P but seriously if you look at every team that wins super coach they have some level of risk involved in their team. you dont want to be one of those teams with without one mid pricer or injury prone or risky player