A very important poll for all

Started by starz, January 29, 2012, 04:21:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Thoughts please

Stephenson/ giles and heppel
8 (88.9%)
Smedts/other back rookie and sandilands
1 (11.1%)

Total Members Voted: 2

starz

You see I still can't make my mind up to what sort of structure I should be going with. So to give you an odea of what I'm talking about

Start a rook rookie and back premium:

This would mean stewing the big o or giles which I think is better than starting a back rookie as I think they will both score very well. However it does mean starting say a heppell where Id much rather start say a sandilands.

Start a rookie bak and premium ruck: this would mean starting three rookie backs which is very risky IMO. But the set and forget ruck goes in place.


Decisions decisions. I am sort of leaning towards the rookie ruck theory because I think it will be better for overall structure I guess I will have to watch the nab cup and see how the big o goes. Also I think slot depends on if spurr gets upgraded

Thoughts appreciated

AndrewY

Sandi or Burger or Mummy and relax....rookie and be nervous each week....IMO

TheMailman

Where's the rest of your team? Stephenson and Giles won't play all 22 games this season IMO

picker_man

i think im about to talk myself back into the rook ruck thoery damn it!
ok so you've gotta work out who you think out of the rookies will play more and ave more as there will be a difference in ave between heppell and sandi but only by 5 points for me so not much 90ave vs 95ave and can be made up by the better rookies
giles / stephenson either one of these 2 should play everygame for you by the bye rounds where you would have either upgraded one or will do so during the bye rounds
for me these guys will ave around 70
smeldts / other back rookie, will these guys definantly play early and week in week out? mohr, morris, ellis yeah you've prolly got a better chance of these 3 but smeldts and someother rookie who knows plus back rookies you would think will ave less then a ruck rook maybe 65-70
so there could b alot more questions with the 2nd option but i think it comes down personal choice personaly. I just remeber set nd forget last yr with sandi
i havnt even made up my decision yet but writing it out 4 u has made me lean even closer to the rook ruck thoery

picker_man

Quote from: TheMailman on January 29, 2012, 04:41:31 PM
Where's the rest of your team? Stephenson and Giles won't play all 22 games this season IMO
yeah you dont rely need them to play all 22 games just enough to make money off one to upgrade them to the best looking premium

starz

Sorry should of posted it. This is my starting 22. Not worrying about byes just yet.

DEF: H. Scotland, B. Goddard, B. Deledio, D. Heppell, P. Duffield, M. Clarke, L. Spurr
MID: D. Swan, S. Pendlebury, G. Ablett jnr, B. Gibbs, K. Horsely, D. Shiel
RUC: D. Cox, O. Stephenson
FWD: L. Franklin, D. Beams, M. Robinson, D. Martin, J. Brown, A.Treloar, D. Zorko

TheMailman

Judging by that team option 1 definately suits you better

PurpleArmy

The only way Spurr will play early is if Freo have a LTI and gets promoted, so I'd look for someone else at the moment

Colliwobblers

maybe you can afford say, jacobs + mummy, keep heppell and turn duffield into the best of waters/grimes/grima/conca/lake ?

jabobs a good pick way cheaper than cox dead easy draw and scored great last season against the weaker teams this season 2 GCs 2 GWS  thats 4 big tons locked in.

TheMailman

Just going to suggest that Colliwobbles  :(

Colliwobblers

Quote from: TheMailman on January 29, 2012, 06:14:27 PM
Just going to suggest that Colliwobbles  :(

and that everybody just proves how intelligent smart and talented The Mailman is  ;D ;D

picker_man

Quote from: Colliwobblers on January 29, 2012, 06:28:04 PM
Quote from: TheMailman on January 29, 2012, 06:14:27 PM
Just going to suggest that Colliwobbles  :(

and that everybody just proves how intelligent smart and talented The Mailman is  ;D ;D
or slow haha :P