Adcock or Scotland

[Tom_16]

Hey guys just wondering who i should pick out of Scotland or Adcock and why. Scotland as we all know is a proven gun but he is expensive and turns 32 this year so is he worth selecting or is he one to upgrade to after his round 13 bye? Also what will Adcock average and is he worth selecting? My other backs are goddard, lids, heppel and grimes. Feedback would be most appreciated, Thanks.

[Football Factory]

The Adcock thread explains why he might be a good addition to your squad. Eventually you have to jump off players as old as Scotland is this the year maybe?

http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,45953.msg618594.html#new

[kilbluff1985]

Would still go Scotland mainly because well he plays for Carlton and the should finish top 6 or top 4 this year and Brisbane well probably bottom 4, Scotland much more consistent then Adcock so if moneys not an issue it's Scotland for me

[jballstars]

Scotland for mine as well 32 isnt as much of an issue for him as hes an outside runner more so than in and under ...Adcock is so inconsistant and with Brisbanes frail backline he will at some stage get a shutdown role which will kill his scoring power

[Colliwobblers]

Scotland gets enough rest for him old legs down back in the blues line up, he also gets enough dt points to justify the expense. Adcock can perform well and hopefully will as I have him, I started adcock and will upgrade to Scotland through the season, purely down to team structure and money.