Birchall or Suckling?

Started by J Pot, August 18, 2011, 05:26:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Who would u rather have in your side?

Suckling
13 (68.4%)
Birchall
6 (31.6%)

Total Members Voted: 1

J Pot

Just a simple question boys. Who would u rather have. Birchall or Suckling?

coolfugitiv0

Suckling definitely. More consistent.

locky

Suckling's named on the I/C, don't know if that's a bad sign...

But Suckling seems to do better than Birchall against both good and bad teams

coolfugitiv0

Quote from: locky on August 18, 2011, 07:33:31 PM
Suckling's named on the I/C, don't know if that's a bad sign...

But Suckling seems to do better than Birchall against both good and bad teams
Was named on the I/C last week as well.
Thought he did well considering :)

locky

Quote from: coolfugitiv0 on August 18, 2011, 08:02:06 PM
Quote from: locky on August 18, 2011, 07:33:31 PM
Suckling's named on the I/C, don't know if that's a bad sign...

But Suckling seems to do better than Birchall against both good and bad teams
Was named on the I/C last week as well.
Thought he did well considering :)

I wasn't sure if that was a recurring theme for Suckling, but I guess it means he'll come on and play the backline loosy picking up the cheap kicks.

Definitely Suckling.

bluedreamin

Suckling has been named on I/C all year.

J Pot

QuoteSuckling has been named on I/C all year.

Yeah a few people told me that. Suckling it is. Thanks boys.
When you see him break his leg in the first minute tonight, think of me  ;D