Hard Options

Started by its me lads, July 22, 2011, 02:52:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Which Option?

Trade Shaw to Newman. 20k
Shaw to Adcock. 70k
Shaw to Gram. 50k
Dont trade this week and Get Fisher next week (if he goes down enough) and get 2 0's
Get someone else instead of Newman, Adcock or Gram. (who?)

its me lads

OK so i have Heath Shaw and dont know what option to do. Take these points into mind when voting. I have 2 trades left if i dont trade shaw i cop 2 donuts. ONLY 2 TRADES LEFT. The number alongside the option is how much money i will have left. Thanks for Voting.  :D

bridge777


thanme


its me lads

waters to much, im also thinking about Alex Rance. I would love to have fisher in but then i have to wait until next week and i'll get 2 0's this week and the not much cash left for when i make my final trade.

Windigo

Broughton? Fisher can be dodgy at times. But still a good option....

its me lads

if i wait until next week when fisher is down in price then this week i have to get two 0's in my backline. I only have 300 dollars in the bank so if i trade shaw ive only got 325k this week and the others are too much like broughton. then next week when fisher goes down and i get him i dont have much money left for whoever i get rid of for my last trade.

BGK

Quote from: Windigo on July 22, 2011, 05:00:52 PM
Broughton? Fisher can be dodgy at times. But still a good option....

Oh how opinions can change. It wasn't so many weeks ago that we were saying Broughton was dodgy. I would go Fisher still one of the most consistent backs available, even with his 33.

Windigo

Quote from: bestguykai on July 22, 2011, 06:01:13 PM
Quote from: Windigo on July 22, 2011, 05:00:52 PM
Broughton? Fisher can be dodgy at times. But still a good option....

Oh how opinions can change. It wasn't so many weeks ago that we were saying Broughton was dodgy. I would go Fisher still one of the most consistent backs available, even with his 33.

I knew Fisher can be 'dodgy' before this year or even last year. I got him fully knowing he can put in a downer once & a while.

BGK

Quote from: Windigo on July 22, 2011, 06:09:24 PM
Quote from: bestguykai on July 22, 2011, 06:01:13 PM
Quote from: Windigo on July 22, 2011, 05:00:52 PM
Broughton? Fisher can be dodgy at times. But still a good option....

Oh how opinions can change. It wasn't so many weeks ago that we were saying Broughton was dodgy. I would go Fisher still one of the most consistent backs available, even with his 33.

I knew Fisher can be 'dodgy' before this year or even last year. I got him fully knowing he can put in a downer once & a while.

Im not sure you could name a defender that doesn't have the off game. Looking back into his history he has only had a handful of games that he failed to score 50 points in.

Windigo

Everyone has downers. Just Fisher is more 'higher profile.'

BGK

Quote from: Windigo on July 22, 2011, 06:39:21 PM
Everyone has downers. Just Fisher is more 'higher profile.'

Fair enough. I would still go for Fisher. he is still a little more consistent than some of the others that have been suggested. I like Waters as a smoky but only if you really want a POD