Which of the 2????

[pinochio]

with teams up pups is only downgrade that can be thought of...

A) Otten > Pups AND Lower > Suckling
B) Otten > Pups AND Stanley > Carrots/Scotland


.....thx fellas...if u want to recommend which blue as well :P

[remon tea]

not considering rob murphy?

[bigsy]

B- stanley will make a good 8th back to keep for cover

[pinochio]

...meaning a bugsy?? :P

[Ziplock]

No brainer A for me. I think by now Suckling has delivered 2 amazing scores, 4 reasonable scores and two poor scores. Better than most anyone else goin' round :P

[jvalles]

Personally I 'd make the downgrade but not the upgrade.  See what some of the guys coming back in are like for a couple of weeks like Malceski, Hargrave and Harbrow after the bye.  Your rooks are just as consistent as any of the premiums except for maybe Gibbs & Delidio.  I would love to have Scotland in my team as he is incredibly consistent, but don't like their bye come finals.

[urfresh23]

What about Sam Fisher?? I was thinking of bringing in Suckling but for an extra $30,000 you get a proven performer in Fisher, just because if you bring in carrots or scotland the have the bye in round 23, i am assuming you would have Gibbs as well, and that means missing two defenders in finals

[yorgis]

finals byes are ok provided u don't have too many players from one club. however u do need to be conservative with your trades.

[pinochio]

maybe i just go lower > pups with the talk of otten coming back soonish....named in SANFL today???

but on the other hand its not as if otten will be some massive scorer.....and suckling wont be this cheaper maybe ever again...???


which one do i do?