Trading players - % Breakdown

[MissPiesFF]

The way I check out my weakness in my team is to look at the percentage breakdown. Obviously rucks are going to be the lowest but you should have at least 9-11% . Midfield is always going to suck up %. And this should out weigh your FWDS and DEF. Fwd's should be the second highest % and then DEF. Example - If you have say 23% in DEF and 31% in FWD then it is obvious(well to me at least) that you need to work on your DEF.

So to break it down
MIDS = 1st - 33- 35%
FWDS = 2nd  27-29%
DEF  = 3rd - 25-27%
Folls  = lowest  9-11%

Note. This may vary depending on where you have your Capt positioned.

Edit: Even if you are already achieving these %'s but still scoring low week in and week out then in my opinion it's time to upgrade.

Thoughts?

[yorgis]

can't work on your defence if there are not enough high scoring defenders around. good point tho'

[MissPiesFF]

can't work on your defence if there are not enough high scoring defenders around. good point tho'

Thx....Carrots(dpp), Lids(dpp), Gibby(dpp), Addy, Scotts(dpp), Heater.. just to name a few. Rawlings looks good too, he's on the up

[LF]

also would depend who is sitting on your bench as well.

[MissPiesFF]

Teams depend on a lot of factors, if we included them all then we would go nuts!

[HTL]

According to that I need to work on my back line, but I already new that  :(

%'s look about right to me, without going into details.

[Problems]

According to that I need to work on my back line, but I already new that  :(

%'s look about right to me, without going into details.

Everyone has to be wary with this idea in 2011. I agree it works but this year, and for example last week, if you had Scotland on your bench and played Lower the %'s will definitely be skewed

[thanme]

Does it matter though?? Why does it need to be balanced?? If there are more higher scoring forwards than backs, get them in.

[HTL]

According to that I need to work on my back line, but I already new that  :(

%'s look about right to me, without going into details.

Everyone has to be wary with this idea in 2011. I agree it works but this year, and for example last week, if you had Scotland on your bench and played Lower the %'s will definitely be skewed

So true I looked at my % last weekend and they were off, but the week before that they were right. Because I had Scotland on the pine. I don't really take much notice of the %'s.

[MissPiesFF]

Does it matter though?? Why does it need to be balanced?? If there are more higher scoring forwards than backs, get them in.

Not saying I am right, just being out there(doing an AFEV) on how I choose my team.  :)

[MissPiesFF]

According to that I need to work on my back line, but I already new that  :(

%'s look about right to me, without going into details.

Everyone has to be wary with this idea in 2011. I agree it works but this year, and for example last week, if you had Scotland on your bench and played Lower the %'s will definitely be skewed

So true I looked at my % last weekend and they were off, but the week before that they were right. Because I had Scotland on the pine. I don't really take much notice of the %'s.

That's the hard part and most challenging, to have players on or off the pine and still rack up the % ie ppr week in and week out.  :)