Hard Suck????

Montag · May 17, 2011, 12:20:00 AM

it is a toughie.
Have brodie smith and want to upgrade but to who. will upgrade to eright later in year but who to get now
suckling
mackie
drummond
chaplin

LaHug · May 17, 2011, 12:52:26 AM

In my opinion, it goes: Suckling, Chaplin, Mackie, Drummond.
Reasons include averages, potential and that Drummond is a DT hack.

elephants · May 17, 2011, 01:45:39 AM

Drummond is an Sc star I think it is worth mentioning. And yeah same order for me as lahug has :)

C-Dogg · May 17, 2011, 06:50:59 AM

drummond for s/c... suck man for dt

Montag · May 17, 2011, 09:15:16 AM

already have lids, heppel, gibbs, rawlings
and will get enright in following weeks

Andrew · May 17, 2011, 02:29:27 PM

Definately Suckling this week.

thatguy · May 17, 2011, 02:31:16 PM

Quote from: Andrew on May 17, 2011, 02:29:27 PM
Definately Suckling this week.

got him for grimes last week and couldnt be happier :)

Andrew · May 17, 2011, 02:33:34 PM

Yeah I think Grimes -> Suckling was a marginally better pick than Shaw. But I need both really. Finishes my defence. The one I'm disappointed about is Duigan -> Enright a couple of weeks back as I'd be selling Duigan for Suckling this week or last week otherwise.

bundyboy · May 17, 2011, 02:35:27 PM

yes - crying the same song.... duigan > enright seemed like a good idea at the time, but spewing now.... :'(

Montag · May 17, 2011, 05:40:09 PM

looking at duigan as a permanent 7th bak or 8th bench. he has great js and he can pull some handy scores

Andrew · May 17, 2011, 06:40:29 PM

Quote from: bundyboy on May 17, 2011, 02:35:27 PM
yes - crying the same song.... duigan > enright seemed like a good idea at the time, but spewing now.... :'(

We were unlucky with Suckling going down with a late knee that week. If given the time I'm sure we would've re-assessed the strategy and kept Duigan but it just felt like Enright was the most solid pick in the backs at the time. Duigan's bye actually worked in his favour in terms of retaining his price. Lesson learnt I guess, but what I'm more spewing about is having the chance to go Michael Johnson (don't ask) to Suckling after 2 rounds, but instead went with Chris Dawes. I had the choice because I had McKernan (DEF/FOR) in defence and Johnson (DEF/FOR) in the forward line. But even though Suckling pulled a 141, I didn't know enough about him compared to the full foward of the dominant side...

Time for the wrong to be corrected - Suckling in this week!

Hard Suck????

Montag

Montag

Montag