Wallis vs Iles.

[TMurphBROWNLOW]

It's $18k difference - how would you like to have that to spend?

think of the Job Security Prospector :P

[Prospector_1]

OK, Iles is in a losing team. Wallis is cheaper. GC are rotating the players. WB are building to stay in contention.

Libba is being rested. Wallis gets his chance to make and hold a place in the team. Which player will play with greater commitment?

Your call.

[TMurphBROWNLOW]

most likely wallis, but McKenna needs his most consistent players on the block, every week and he needs to blood his boys.

one poor game from wallis and he'll be dropped without question. plus, rocket isn't a rookie-loving coach.

[RiOtChEsS]

maybe both just arent solid options :-\

[Prospector_1]

That's a possibility! One of the reasons you didn't start with them?

[TMurphBROWNLOW]

but you're eventually going to have to downgrade a cash cow for somebody, and it may as well be someone who is very likely to play week in week out.

anyway isnt it a risk at the start with picking rookies anyway? :P there's always that element of concern whether or not they will perform or not :)

[Prospector_1]

So, no argument about buying Wallis then, you want to haggle about who goes out now?

[TMurphBROWNLOW]

i'm still content on iles. i've done the trade and im happy.