trade and partial lockout loophole

[jasonweare]

I've been considering a few things tonight, and at the moment i'm looking at two 0's this week. Otten in the back line, looking at trading him down to either hibberd or thompson? Or hibberd in the mids once on the bubble.

Which would give me around $124,000 to use for an upgrade. i'm thinking a midfield upgrade of either sidebottom or adams. Considering upgrading steele. As after his bye, he has 3 weeks of massive b/e's. Which will cost alot more (down to $366,000) to upgrade after that. Whereas adams looks to hit his top money round 9 or 10.

With around $546,000 i could afford most of the top prems. pendles, boyd, or bartel, selwood, mundy, priddis next week. Priddis looking really good. thinking him or boyd maybe.

With cox as v.c for the partial lockout, would you take his 131? or leave it to swanny to up his score? If i was to take cox, i'd probably give prestia captain as he's already going to be my forwardline 0, with 3 none players on the pine. And not worry about swan been emergency or whatever.

thanks in advance for people's thoughts.

[Phreophile]

Take the 131 from Captain Cox. If Captain Swan gets 150 you will only get 19 more points. If non-captain Swan gets 100, then you will be 31 points better off leaving captain as Cox. Take what is in the bank.

[ajjewell]

It will be 19 points doubled so 38, but I do agree go with what you have not what you could get

[Fletch74]

It will be 19 points doubled so 38, but I do agree go with what you have not what you could get

No it's not, it is 19.

If you use Cox, you get 262 + Swan's 150 = 412
If you use Swan, you get 300 + Cox's 131 = 431

Difference = 19, not 38

[Phreophile]

Well explained Fletch.