Adcock or Grimes?

[dicey7]

Hey all who do you think has the better scoring potential over the season?

Ill be trading broughton to either one

what are your thoughts

[Master Q]

Both are good. I like Adcock though.

[Ziplock]

both have high scoring potential, both have high injury concerns. IMO to be in it, you need both. Out of the two though, on current form, adcock comes up top :)

[dicey7]

yeah my only concern with adcock is the return of Drummond

will he have an effect on adcocks scoring

[nostradamus]

go with ur gut

[C-Dogg]

Grimes as melb will get better, and yes josh drummond Might hurt adCOCK score

[thiv]

adcock is playing more in the midfield so his score won't get affected by drummond

[Master Q]

both have high scoring potential, both have high injury concerns. IMO to be in it, you need both. Out of the two though, on current form, adcock comes up top :)

Well Said ^^

[plugz19]

both have high scoring potential, both have high injury concerns. IMO to be in it, you need both. Out of the two though, on current form, adcock comes up top :)

+1

[skooper]

Is anyone considering Suckling instead?

[Andrew]

I started with Grimes & Adcock, and am going to get Suckling after Hawthorn's bye. He's still at a good price to end up being your 6th/7th defender. Looked too good on the weekend.

[Stocutz]

Is anyone considering Suckling instead?

I already have grimes was considering suckling over adcock but with most o the talk vein take adcock I think I might end up going adcock. It's a tough decision my gut is saying adcock however sucklings kick ing is top class and js appears permanent. Both have big scoring ability. Can adcock keep 100s up?

[Holz]

1. grimes 2. adcock 3. suckling but i would persoanlly leave it for a week and bring in enright if you dont have him, i think he has a low BE as his only bad score for the season is about to drop out.